Focus on the methods your author has used to gather their information; is this a reliable method? Does the author use their chosen method correctly?

In this 2 to 4-page paper (600 to 1200 words), you are expected to do more than summarize the article you have chosen.
Your paper is a critical review of the content of your article; this means you will tell me what the author intended to say & and how they said it (summary) and then evaluate whether the author was successful in stating and supporting their argument (analysis).
o Summary should make up no more than 1/2 of your papers length.
o Analysis will vary depending on the article you have chosen; here are some examples of analysis on which you may choose to focus:
You may choose to focus on the methods your author has used to gather their information; is this a reliable method? Does the author use their chosen method correctly?
You may focus on the authors background; is this author qualified to carry out this type of work? Why or why not? (hint: critical analysis is not always negative)
You may focus on the evidence presented; is it compelling? Does it fully support what the author is trying to prove? Why or why not?
You may feel that information is missing or that some information presented dont quite fit in the article; why or why not? This might be especially useful for those of you who chose to read a review article.
There are many other avenues you may choose to pursue in your analysis
If you use additional sources to critique your article, you must cite those sources.
This document might be helpful: https://ctl.utsc.utoronto.ca/twc/sites/default/files/CritReview.pdf

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]