The source you are peer reviewing’s instructions and prompt:
(You are not answering these questions. This is just the instructions for the essay so you can peer review what they answered and what they missed.)
In your responses, summarizing the readings should take up no more than a paragraph. The remainder of your response should be dedicated to your argument. Additional questions to consider include: What did the readings do well? What did they fail to account for? What additional questions about this topic/topics should scholars of international relations be interested in? How might policy makers use or misuse the theories discussed?
Do you agree with Rieff that we are experiencing the end of human rights? What indicators do we have that human rights protections are failing vs. indicators that they are succeeding?
What are the most effective tools for protecting individual rights? In your answer, you may wish to consider the ICC, R2P, other treaties, economic sanctions, diplomacy, etc.
Instructions for your peer review:
(Questions you are answering)
Your goal is to both acknowledge what the author did well and to offer constructive criticism. While commenting on writing style, grammar, or spelling is helpful, it is secondary to engaging with the topic and argument. Were you convinced by the response? Why or why not? In what ways could it be improved?
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]