Demonstrate mastery of the readings. You should identify a central argument(s) made in the readings(s), comment on the evidence rallied in support of the argument(s), and reflect on some of the broader implications of the argument(s).

You will be required to produce ONE short paper, roughly 7 pages in length (or approximately 2000 words), in which you discuss or react to two or more course readings from at least two different weeks of the course. The final paper should be in essay format with introduction, main section with subtitles, and conclusion. It should be produced in 12-point font with 1 margins, double-spaced, carefully proofread, and titled. You should provide a full reference, either in the form of a footnote, or a works cited section at the end of the paper.

Your final discussion paper should accomplish several things:

1. Demonstrate mastery of the readings. You should identify a central argument(s) made in the readings(s), comment on the evidence rallied in support of the argument(s), and reflect on some of the broader implications of the argument(s). You should also attempt to reflect on some of the interconnections or conflicts among the readings we have covered.

2. Express a reaction to the readings in a reasoned, analytical, and well-supported manner. Additionally, your commentary should identify one or two questions that the reading(s) raised for you. For example, were you convinced by the authors line of argument? Why or why not? Do other pieces we have read raise challenges for the author in question? Or does the reading successfully open up a new line of questioning?

3. Put the readings you discuss in dialogue with one another. How do the ideas expressed in the readings you cover stack up against one another? Your discussion should be thoughtful, analytical and evaluative.

The 4 sources I want in my paper are attached below in additional materials!

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]