In what ways is the documentary misleading? What have you gleaned from the course readings, for example, that might allow you to assess the claims presented in the documentary more critically?

Commentary on Video Documentaries:
NO MORE THAN TWO PAGES each, analyzing one of the video documentaries listed in the syllabus. Special attention will be given to analyzing or criticizing the documentary. I already know what they are about. Tell me what the investigators did wrong, got wrong, forgot to cover, misinterpreted, etc. Focus on the politics/policy aspects of each respective documentary. Where are their errors/biases? In what ways is the documentary misleading? What have you gleaned from the course readings, for example, that might allow you to assess the claims presented in the documentary more critically? What policy implications are recommended by each documentary? Do you accept these recommendations? Why or why not?

VIDEO DOCUMENTARY: Nuclear 101: How Nuclear Bombs Work Part 2, Pt 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MnW7DxsJth0 also Rickover: The Birth of Nuclear Power https://ucsd.kanopy.com/video/rickover-birth-nuclear-power-0 (alternate source: Amazon Prime free trial): https://www.amazon.com/Rickover-Nuclear-Tim-Blake-Nelson/dp/B00QWRC210/ref=tmm_aiv_swatch_1?_encoding=UTF8&qid=&sr=

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]