Taxes, retirement, and financial policies are some of the most controversial areas of policy development. There are a variety of opinions, data sources, and expert reports out there on each of these areas. Therefore, along with all proposed policy, it is important that we can evaluate each policy. In this week’s lesson, we discussed the three primary and five ancillary evaluative criteria ((Listed below)) that Kraft considers essential in analyzing policies. So, let’s put this information into practice. Let’s take a look at some articles or resources on taxes, retirement, and financial policies.
For your forum post:
(1) Summarize the key points made within the article.
(2) Now, select at least three evaluative criteria from this week’s lesson to analyze the points made in the article. For example, did the author address the equity of the policy and if so, what did they say? If they didn’t address it, what do you think the author would have said about the missing evaluative criteria?
(3) Analyze the policy alternatives for your selected policy topic/article.
Note: most everything has impact on most of these three things. I dont want to see things that are impacted by fiscal, tax, or retirement (almost everything in life is), but policy that is created as financial, tax, or retirement policy. There are no word count requirements so long as your cover the required details.
Explain and evaluating a public policy begins with identifying goals and objectives. How well the policy met those goals and objectives is measured using criteria. These criteria can be economic, equitable, technical, political, or administrative in nature. Means such as cost-benefit analyses, the Delphi technique, and impact assessments are further used to facilitate this process.
Three Primary:
1. Effectiveness, or a measurement of how well a policy achieves its goal;
2. Efficiency, a measurement of the cost of a policy in relation to its expected benefits; and
3. Equity, a measurement of the level of fairness in the distribution of costs and benefits in society.
Five Ancillary:
Ethics
Political feasibility
Social acceptability
Administrative feasibility
Technical feasibility
Reading list:
When is transformation a viable policy alternative? https://doi-org.ezproxy2.apus.edu/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.07.022
ARTICLE: AN ALTERNATIVE FOOD POLICY, 37 W. New Eng. L. Rev. 1 http://digitalcommons.law.wne.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1729&context=lawreview
BEHAVIORAL PUBLIC CHOICE: THE BEHAVIORAL PARADOX OF GOVERNMENT POLICY. Authors: VISCUSI, W. KIP1 kip.viscusi@vanderbilt.edu GAYER, TED2 t https://www.mercatus.org/system/files/Viscusi-Behavioral-Public-Choice.pdf
SCHOOL-TO-PRISON PIPELINE: AN EVALUATION OF ZERO TOLERANCE POLICIES AND THEIR ALTERNATIVES Ruiz, Roco Rodrguez.Houston Law Review;
https://houstonlawreview.org/article/3920-school-to-prison-pipeline-an-evaluation-of-zero-tolerance-policies-and-their-alternatives
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]