What ideas did you disagree with, and what other examples point to a different perspective on how humans communicate and behave?

Your 200-word,You may choose to make any point that you wish related to the course material (readings, video lectures, other posts). Please do not hesitate to email me or visit Zoom office hours if I can help decide a topic or analytical angle for your post.

For RWS 305 discussions, take note of ideas that we read or see on videos and PowerPoints that interest you. Think in terms of rhetoric: argument, persuasion, relationship-building, human decision-making. Why do different messages appeal to different audiences? What ideas in the course content surprised you, and why? What ideas reminded you of other examples that might yield fresh insights into how humans communicate and behave? (Your major, future profession, and sociocultural background might provide those examples.) What ideas did you disagree with, and what other examples point to a different perspective on how humans communicate and behave?

Romare Bearden painting

The main purposes of these boards are 1) to provide new perspectives and insights into course material, just as a face-to-face discussion in class would and 2) to provide more practice writing analytically, especially in brief online settings.

Your post should begin with a sentence or possibly two of context, wherein you explain what concept from the readings, videos, and PowerPoints that you’re responding to. Other that those one or two sentences, you should not summarize the reading or video. Your post should offer your own analysis. If most of your post simply summarizes, do not expect higher than a C, even if it is well-written. If all of your post simply summarizes, not to expect higher than a D+. Remember, one of the main purposes here is to offer the type of discussion that we might have in a face-to-face class; in that setting, you would not be likely to raise your hand simply to summarize the reading for your classmates, who have also done the reading.

Romare Bearden painting

This is a good forum to “try out” ideas — please do not feel like you must be able to defend everything you say as if your life depended on it. Your post can have a merely tangential connection to the readings or lectures, but it should relate fairly clearly to rhetoric/human communication. Your post can have sort of a “I’m not totally sure if this idea really works, but it seems like . . .” kind of vibe. Obviously, trying out new ideas works best when were respectful of others, open-minded about adopting other perspectives, and generous with giving one another the benefit of the doubt when we disagree.

Try to use the detached, analytical perspective that I mentioned last week. If you find someone else’s post to be wrong-headed, instead of saying, “I’m offended by your comment that college students complain too much because I think you’re insulting college students who also have jobs,” try for something more like, “College students who have jobs might very well by offended by the claim that college students complain too much.” De-personalize the discussion. That will add to your post or comment’s depth anyway.

Romare Bearden painting

The main grading criteria will be the 1) originality and 2) depth of your post.

Originality consists of relating an idea or concept to an example that wasn’t part of the reading video, or from exploring a relatively minor example from reading or lecture in much greater detail. You can find originality in your other classes or in your personal life and observations.
Depth consists of relating an idea or concept to universal aspects of humans, human nature, human relationships, or human reactions.
Good Discussion Board posts often end up having one paragraph that offers an original example and then one paragraphs that explores the concept in depth. Think about how you’re organizing your ideas.

In general, think about using your Discussion Board work to add to the class’s understanding. Your original thread will be the main part of your Discussion Board grade, but 50-word responses that offer originality and/depth will increase your grade also. By Thursday, February 4, you should write at least two 50-word responses to your classmates’ threads or comments.

Romare Bearden painting

Grading Rubric:

A range: Analysis with well-developed originality and depth. Well-written and -organized.

B range: Analysis with well-developed originality or depth. Both originality and depth may be present, but only one is well-developed. Well-written and -organized.

C range: Analysis with originality or depth. Development is at an upperclassman level, but it does not rise above the average. Writing and organization may not be above average.

D range: S

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Virtual and Augmented Reality in Architecture

1 document in total. Annotated bibliography with 6 total sources(3 sources you will create, and 3 you find in your independent research) with 10-12 sentence annotations. The sources are all to be about Virtual and Augmented Reality in Architecture.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JwXBpzejr1KU-TnSSxryZXocxoC0qJK3fYWTgs3bX7o/copy?usp=sharing

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1J_Az4Nb85bBDJhzH0WTkIvAonK7msX2vwJEg-x3iArM/edit

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Final student responses

This assignment is easy which you are responding to the students. I also gave a wordcount for each student that in the student response document 70, 70, 70, 60 that’s a total of 270 words for this one paper.

Website link for chapters:

https://openstax.org/books/introduction-sociology-2e/pages/1-1-what-is-sociology

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

How has the state fostered innovation and regulated the pace and direction of technological change? What role have experts played in this process?

This assignment asks you to consider how Americans have chosen to innovate and adopt technologies, both as a society and as individuals. You must engage with the following four related questions in a holistic manner, not as separate issues. Use historical examples drawn from course readings, lectures, and discussions to engage with these questions and to construct an original and thoughtful argument about social and individual choice regarding technology.

You will write a more focused and coherent paper if you limit your analysis to a particular category of technology: for example, transportation, communication, information and computing, energy, medicine and biotechnology, etc.

1. How has the state fostered innovation and regulated the pace and direction of technological change? What role have experts played in this process?

2. How has the market and private enterprise fostered innovation and regulated the pace and direction of technological change? What role has advertising played in this process? What is the relationship between technological innovation and consumer society?

3. How have you yourself chosen to adopt and use technologies, both in your role as a consumer and as a citizen?

4. By way of conclusion, give your considered opinion on the question of how we as a society and as individuals ought to make decisions about technological innovation and adoption. What standards and values would you apply to make these decisions?

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Careers in Emergency Management

Please see all the information about the topics and the screenshot including in the folder. Follow all the resources, and make sure all the requirements of pages are exact, not extra besides what is asking, also, APA style. Any questions, please call, not email. Thank you and God Bless,

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Case Study on Deutsche Bank and the Road to Basel III by Yiorgos Allayannis, Gerry Yemen, Andrew Wicks, Matthew Dougherty

The case study reports do not have a specified length, but they must have a logical structure that clearly flows throughout the reports. The following structure can be used to ensure that the analysis is complete:

Section A: Introduction
Articulate the main problem and summarize the thesis
Section B: Background Information and Methodology
State facts and issues that are relevant to the problem
Explain the methods used to evaluate solutions
Section C: Alternatives
Identify alternative solutions and explain why they were rejected
Section D: Solutions
Provide an implementable solution to the problem and an explanation for why that solution is proposed.
Describe risks, contingencies, benefits and shortcomings
Section E: Recommendations and Conclusions
Present a strategic plan that could be used to implement the proposed solution

*This case study is solely based on the article I mentioned in the Topic.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Write a brief summary of your findings above (2 pages max) making the case whether you would be for or against the license renewal for this station in terms of:

PART 1: PICON ARGUMENT ANALYSIS

This is the most important part of this semester-long assignment. Based upon the information you discovered about your station the past weeks

You emailed a station. Did they respond?
You did a profiled the station (commercials, sponsors, etc.)
You mapped out in a grid/table all of the programming the station provides
You reviewed what watchdog groups say they think media should be doing for the public

Write a brief summary of your findings above (2 pages max) making the case whether you would be for or against the license renewal for this station in terms of:

How it is (or is not) serving PICON the Public’s Interest, Convenience or Necessity especially in terms of localism (serving the local people it is licensed to serve)
You cannot make this determination without a thorough presentation of how you are defining culture and the concept of “the public’s interest”. In other words, how are you judging your station in order to come up with your opinions?

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]