Needs to be 1000 words and use relevant references. We use Harvard referencing. It is a literature review so critical analysis of literature surfing this question .
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]To Prepare: Choose one of the following social work policy makers as the focus of your paper, and identify a signature social policy effected by that person:
Jane Addams
Clara Barton
Dorothy Day
William Edward B. DuBois
Medgar Evers
Mary Richmond
Dorothea Spellman
Harriett Tubman
Booker T. Washington
By Day 7
Submit a 4- to 6-page scholarly paper using the following outline:
Biography of the Social Work Policy Maker
Provide a brief background of the policy maker, including family and professional history.
The Social Welfare Policy/Service
Describe the core tenets of the policy developed by the policy maker upon which you focused.
Explain the community needs for this policy.
Describe the population/community served by this policy.
Explain the process of developing and enacting this policy.
Impact of the Policy
Describe how this policy addressed the needs of a population/community.
Describe how this policy advocated for a population and served social justice.
Explain how this policy changed the community.
Practice Implications
Discuss how this policy impacts social work practice today.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]Final Paper
Prepare an 11- to 15-page paper (not including the title and reference pages) that assesses a legal/ethical issue or situation relating to a current, previous, or potential future work environment. Use at least 10 scholarly sources that are suitable for research in a graduate-level course.
Your paper must include the following:
A description of a business situation that presents a legal and ethical issue. The business situation must be from prior, current, or anticipated future employment experiences or from a current event. The description of the business situation must not exceed two pages.
An analysis of the ethical concerns raised by the situation.
Apply at least two different ethical theories to the situation to support at least two different outcomes.
The paper must determine which ethical outlook as applied to this particular situation will result in the best legal outcome for the business.
An explanation of at least three of the relevant areas of law that have been addressed in this course (e.g., constitutional law, contracts, anti-trust law, securities regulations, employment law, environmental law, crimes, or torts) and an assessment of the each area of law as it applies to the business situation identified.
A recommendation to reduce liability exposure and improve the ethical climate or the overall ethics of the situation. Your recommendation must be supported by specific legal, ethical, and business principles.
Writing the Final Paper
The Final Paper:
Must be 11 to 15 double-spaced pages in length (not including the title and reference pages), and formatted according to APA Style (Links to an external site.) as outlined in the Writing Centers APA Formatting for Microsoft Word (Links to an external site.) resource.
Must include a separate title page with the following:
Title of paper in bold font
Space should appear between the title and the rest of the information on the title page.
Students name
Name of institution (University of Arizona Global Campus)
Course name and number
Instructors name
Due date
Must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph. Your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper.
For assistance on writing Introductions & Conclusions (Links to an external site.) as well as Writing a Thesis Statement (Links to an external site.), refer to the Writing Center resources.
Must use at least 10 scholarly sources in addition to the course text.
The Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources (Links to an external site.) table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source for a particular assignment.
Must document any information used from sources in APA Style as outlined in the Writing Centers APA: Citing Within Your Paper (Links to an external site.) guide.
Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA Style as outlined in the Writing Center. See the APA: Formatting Your References List (Links to an external site.) resource in the Writing Center for specifications.
Carefully review the Grading Rubric (Links to an external site.) for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]Prior to beginning work on this assignment, review Chapters 5, 7, 8, 11, and 12, which are the primary chapters in the textbook and provide you with the theoretical foundations for this project. Also review the Exploring BorderlandsAmerican Passages: A Literary Survey video. Many of the other resources in the previous weeks may also be helpful.
Remember that you have already created nine of the required 15 activities for this assignment in Weeks 2, 3, and 4. You received feedback from your instructor and from the Writing Center on those activity papers. You are expected to incorporate that feedback into the nine activities already created. During this last week, you will place those activities in the appropriate room in your proposal and create the remaining six activities.
Focus of the Final Project:
Your community is planning to open a brand-new child development community center. Now that you are an expert in the field, you have been chosen to create a proposal for interactive, fun, and educational programming activities that will be provided for children and adolescents in this center. The chosen activities must be developmentally appropriate and based in theory. You will present your ideas to the city council with a written proposal describing the programming in detail. You have been asked to propose programming for the following five different age groups in the child development community center:
Infant (0-1 year)
Toddler (1-3 years)
Early Childhood (3-6 years)
Middle to Late Childhood (7-12 years)
Adolescence (13-18 years)
Use this Community Child Development Center Proposal Template to organize your proposal. Enter the requested information on the title page where indicated. Where you find the text, In this section you will describe the activity within the proposal template, please remove that and enter your own content. The headings in bold should not be altered. The final content for each room will consist of three paragraphs that will address three distinct activities that address physical, cognitive, and psychosocial development for that age group. Table 5.1 in your textbook will be very useful in identifying the major milestones in physical development.
In your Community Child Proposal:
Describe the activity in some detail (provide more than just the name of the activity).
Identify the specific domain related theory concept that supports the use of this activity.
Identify how the activity enhances physical, cognitive, or psychosocial development.
Special Notes:
A good way to brainstorm different age appropriate activities is using Googles search tool before researching. Please review What Is CRAAP? A Guide to Evaluating Web Sources. For example, enter activities to support cognitive development in toddlers and numerous sites with suggested activities will be displayed. Remember that your activities may be simple (especially with newborns), but they must also be specific and age appropriate, and you are to connect them to developmental theory within the proposal. You must also cite the sources in your proposal.
While much of the theoretical support for your proposal will come from the textbook, you must include information somewhere in the proposal from three credible or scholarly sources. If you included a source in your Weeks 2, 3, and 4 papers, then you have already met this requirement. Just transfer the source to the final proposal.
The Community Center Proposal:
Must be nine to 10 double-spaced pages in length (not including the title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style
Must include a separate title page with the following:
Title of project
Students name
Course name and number
Instructors name
Date submitted
Must use at least three scholarly or credible sources in addition to the text book
Community Child Development Center Proposal Template: loaded in Files Section
Week 2 & 3 pape:r loaded in Files Section
Week 3 paper will be loaded once completed by write on 2 May
Coursebook: Mossler, R. A. (2014). Child and adolescent development (2nd ed). Retrieved from https://content.ashford.edu/
Exploring BorderlandsAmerican Passages: A Literary Survey:
https://fod.infobase.com/PortalPlaylists.aspx?wID=100753&xtid=113243
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]During Week 2, much focus is placed on various strategic thinking models and the impact upon the overall organizational strategic process. Now that you have a broad knowledge of your chosen organization, it is time to dig a bit deeper into the structure and the process by which decisions are made within the company. Define the specific organizational design and the governance structure of the chosen company. Support your choices with specific examples and research.
During Week 1, you researched and identified a specific problem or challenge the organization is experiencing. Describe the challenge and explain why it is a problem for the organization. Include how the problem is or has the potential to affect the strategies of the company. Be specific and support your findings. (Week 1 paper loaded in files section for reference)
Section 2 of the paper must have at a minimum two full pages of content (excluding the cover and reference pages). You must include at a minimum two scholarly resources (in addition to the text) that support specific strategies used to prepare the paper. Wikipedia is not a qualified resource. Use the Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, and Other Credible Source documents. Include the text as a scholarly resource to support theory and concepts related to strategy. During the construction of Section 2, be specific and refrain from assumption.
The Section 2 of the Capstone Paper
Must be at least two double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA Style.
Must include a separate title page with the following:
Title of paper
Students name
Course name and number
Instructors name
Date submitted
Must utilize academic voice
Must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph. Your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper.
Must use at least two scholarly, peer-reviewed credible sources in addition to the course text.
Section 1 (Week 1 Assignment) is loaded in Files section for reference.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]Advantages and disadvantages of COVID-19 on the micro-economy
Recommendations must be made to government
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]Prior to beginning this discussion, read Chapters 3 and 4 of the course text.
Thinking strategically using strategic models and techniques must be the precursor to strategic planning and implementation. The perception of thinking is often considered to be a subjective out of the box process with little defense or research of the proposed opportunity. Strategic thinking may contain those same proposed outcomes; however, the process includes defined research models defending and supporting the recommendations for a sustainable business model.
Two companies that are at opposite ends of the spectrum in development and growth are Whole Foods and Kmart. For this discussion, provide a researched summary for one of the two organizations including its history and current market situation. Define the success or failure of their business model and the potential for future sustainability. Support your thoughts using one or more of the described strategic thinking techniques, such as blue ocean, structured brainstorming, Abells three-dimensional business definition model, strategic frontiers, four-action framework, and strategy canvas.
Using the same company, perform a brief external environmental analysis looking at the industry, the competition, the market, and the general environment to defend your strategic thinking choices and explain how the analysis will support future strategic planning and implementation, either as a growth opportunity or a termination of business.
You must support your post with at least two scholarly resources in addition to the text to defend your positions and findings.
Chosen Company: K-Mart
Coursebook: Abraham, S. C. (2012). Strategic management for organizations . Bridgepoint Education.
Chapter 3 & 4 from coursebook loaded in files section
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]Zeroing in on race, and how its treated in film
noir (and neo-noir), give a critical interpretation of its place, its function, and its presence (or absence) in one or more of the following films (e.g., Thieves Highway, Kiss Me Deadly, Touch
of Evil, Devil in a Blue Dress, L.A. Confidential). What do these noirs and/or neo-noirs have to say about
race in America after the Second World War and in our time?
No outside sources are needed
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]Consider the case of the narrator in George Orwells short story Shooting an Elephant and his deliberations about whether to shoot the elephant. Select two authors (Aristotle, Mencius, Metz, Kant, Sedgwick, Ross, or Scanlon) and determine which gives a better explanation of the moral position the narrator is in.
It will have the following form:
1. brief introduction
a. this introduction should include only a description of what you will do in the paper
2. a neutral and accurate description of the action at issue
a. include only the details that will be relevant to the moral assessments or explanations of the two authors you choose.
3. the explanation philosopher A would give of the action at issue
a. this will take three parts.
i. first, you must explain what, in general, is morally relevant according to A (and provide citations to support these explanations)
ii. second, you must identify the corresponding aspects of the action at issue
iii. third, you must explain how A would explain the moral situation the narrator is in.
4. the explanation philosopher B would give of the action at issue
a. same parts as 3, except for philosopher B
5. an argument that philosopher A/B gives a better explanation
a. this is not merely about who correctly evaluates the action, but also about who correctly identifies the reason for the evaluation.
b. if you think neither A nor B correctly explains the action, you should identify the morally relevant feature that neither recognize the significance of, or the problem both have in accounting for its significance.
6. optional: responses to objections on behalf of A and/or B
7. brief conclusion
a. this should only include: a description of the parts of your paper, your main claim, and (optional) further questions that this raises that might be worth thinking about.
In writing, make sure that you make note of any evidence that the narrator agrees with either position, in the portions of the story where he discusses his own judgments about what he ought to do.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]The title of the course is “Personhood.” Using various examples throughout the course, we explore ways society has constructed the idea of personhood and who/what is given space within personhood.
Tom Kitwood defines personhood as “A standing or status that is bestowed upon one human being by others, in the context of relationship and social being. It implies recognition, respect and trust.”
Using this model of personhood, explore the relevant issues surrounding artificial intelligence (AI) and the potentiality of AIs inclusion into personhood, then build an argument for or against AIs inclusion into personhood.
Questions to consider: Can a machine become a person? Is intelligence the only factor in being considered a person? Can AI develop emotions and social skills? What of AI’s ability to participate in the legal system?
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]