Category: Essay

NO sources needed

try to make it smooth and add some words to make it interesting to topic how my idea will help the community throw my design

write a dialogue between Jefferson and Hamilton over the issue of the bank of the unites states with each man explaining his position and attacking the other . select points which display the overall philosophy of each man about not only the bank, but American society and the future of the nation

this is the question :

a) Briefly explain the reasons why many multinational enterprises in Asia utilise multiple production locations located in a number of countries for production of parts and components and assembly of final goods.
(b) Using two case studies of firms headquartered in two different countries, show how the growth of trade and investment links among several Asian economies is related to the strategic production and location decisions of firms. Describe and explain the main considerations of these two firms in determining where to locate specific activities.

The below reminder is what the lectucer said ::
“”To be able to show that intra-Asian trade and investment links arise from operations by firms you need to choose firms so that there are inter-Asian investment links due to firm operations and also intra-Asian investment links due to firm operations.

This can happen (1 ) if the two firms can be head quartered outside Asia countries with production bases in several Asian countries, with linkages through intra-firm trade in parts and components etc. OR (2) firms are headquarter in two Asian countries with production bases in one or more other Asian countries OR it may be headquartered somewhere else but has production bases in two or more Asian countries with there being trade in parts and components etc among the various Asian production bases.

So choose firms to ensure you can illustrate how intra-Asian trade and investment links that arise from such multinational firms””

Body paragraph list at least 3 determining factors in support of Empire or Nation. The determining factors need to be properly supported by facts.

Forum 4.1
Organizational Culture
instructions
1 studies and analyzes the presentation of this module on the main concepts of organizational culture in management. Presentation Attached
2 Use the following guiding questions as a basis for discussion:
a. Define the concept of “organizational culture”.
b. Explain the difference between culture and organization.
c. Mentions and discusses some features of the organizational culture.
d. How the culture of a country can affect or change the organizational culture of a company?
e. Share with your classmates some cases in which companies have had to modify or change its organizational culture to adapt to the national culture of the employees of a particular country.

Presentation:
In Module Three we learned the fundamental differences between the concepts of culture and organizational culture. The discussion focused on the concept of culture as a key element in social situations. This module discusses, in detail, the concept of organizational culture as an essential element in the functioning of institutions, businesses and enterprises. The different manifestations of corporations in organizational performance and strategic phases using different companies in the dynamics of international trade will be studied.
Organizational culture
In this section the concept of organizational culture will be discussed. But to fully understand this concept, it is first necessary to know its components individually: organization and culture. In the module number three, the concept of culture was defined, so then we will discuss the organization concept.
In evaluating the official definitions of the word organization and its use in the language of business, it can be concluded that contains three basic meanings. First, as an action of sorts that can be performed; second, as an arrangement or order to be set to run a process or thing; and third, as an association of persons or institution with a common goal.
According to Hodgetts, Luthans and Doh (2005) organizational culture is a system of “shared values and beliefs that allow the group members understand their roles and norms of the organization.”
• Moreover, Robbins and Judge (2007) define organizational culture as “a system of meanings shared by members of a group that distinguish the organization from other organizations.”
• Finally, to Schein (2004) is “A pattern of basic assumptions that were learned by a group that solved its problems of external adaptation and internal integration, which were good enough to be considered valid and, therefore, to be taught to new members as the correct way to perceive, think, and feel in relation to those problems.”
Organizational culture is nothing but the manifestation of social individuals in organizational microcosm. In other words, it is the normal process of socialization of individuals, but framed in the environment of an organization. This requires individuals to interact socially, but with a number of limitations, controls and regulators of conduct imposed by the organization as a natural interaction through policies, procedures, standards and unique to each individual and organization rules.
Organizational culture causes an individual to be restricted in its organizational interaction, to change their natural social behavior motivated by an organizational rule that replaces the natural behavior of the individual. The individual, inclusive, may substitute their behavior by new rules and regulations, causing a permanent change of behavior in the individual.
In summary, organizational culture can occur in the workplace through various characteristics that represent the fingerprint of the organization. Some of these can be perceived with the naked eye, such as trademarks to identify companies; others are kept confidential, such as strategies or technologies used to achieve organizational objectives.
Characteristic:
Beliefs
Technical Language
Norms or rules
symbols
customs
structures
values
technology
systems
strategies
traditions

provide a memo predicting the exchange rate between the USD and the Euro. The final grade will be determined by the sophistication of your methodology (e.g., technical analysis, regression, analytical) method for forecasting the exchange rate.

To avoid the possibility of plagiarism, do not copy chunks of material from your sources. You are expected to read the material and then express the ideas in your own words, while giving credit to the source of the material. If a student plagiarizes they will at minimum fail the course. No more than 15% of your paper may be directly cited from other sources.

In this Reflection Journal, define and discuss Critical Literacy. Consider how this theory impacts your teaching practices and what can you add to the conversation from a pro or con perspective? Please refer and include information from this Module’s Readings.

I will attach the reading

For your paper, answer this question about the primary sources in Brown, Going to the Source, Chapter 3:
1. How do each of the two newspapers—the Chicago Tribune and the Chicago Times—differ in their depictions of the violent incidents during the strike? Given what you have learned about the late 19th century United States, how do you explain these differences? Be sure to support your analysis of the primary sources with information and citations from course lectures, Eric Foner’s The Story of American Freedom, and the online textbook Digital History.

Your answer to this question will be your thesis. A thesis is an interpretation of the primary source evidence in the appropriate historical context. Excellent papers introduce the topic, anchor the reader in the time and place, and provide information to contextualize their analysis. Excellent papers address the entire question, in all of its parts, and draw relevant and detailed evidence from primary and secondary sources. Excellent papers develop the connections among different primary sources, rather than writing about each one separately. They will also consider evidence that might contradict the argument or thesis, and defend the position that is taken. Excellent papers do not pass judgment on the events of the past, though they do explain and interpret those events. Mediocre papers concentrate on only one source, or fail to incorporate both the primary and secondary sources. A paper that does not cite evidence from the relevant readings or does not answer one of the questions is unacceptable.
Which primary sources should you use?
 All papers are required to analyze the newspaper articles in Brown, Chapter 3 (on the Pullman strike). There is not a minimum number of articles you should include. Include as many as you need to make a strong analysis and support your argument.
 You may use the “Gilded Age” primary sources (assigned for class reading on 9/25) to support your argument. This is not required. These primary sources should be used ONLY as supplementary evidence to support your argument about the newspaper articles.
 You may use newspaper articles from the time period from the New York Times Historical database. This is not required. These primary sources should be used ONLY as supplementary evidence to support your argument about the newspaper articles.
What secondary sources should you use?
 The parts of Brown’s Chapter 3 that are secondary rather than primary sources
 Any section in Digital History http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/ You are most likely to find
useful background in the section on the Gilded Age.
 Eric Foner, The Story of American Freedom, Chapter 6.
 You are not required to consult any other secondary sources outside of those I have provided. In
fact, I strongly discourage you from using other sources.

Remember that a good history paper does not necessarily look like a good paper for an English, Criminology, Philosophy, or Psychology class. Every discipline has its own conventions. To succeed on this paper, you should familiarize yourself with what history papers are like.
For further descriptions of how to approach assignments like this, see Mary Lynn Rampolla, A Pocket Guide to Writing in History, excerpts from Chapter 4

What are the formatting requirements for this paper?
 Typed, double-spaced, 12 pt-font, 1″ margins
 1300-1500 words; or about 4-5 double spaced pages
 Include a header (single-spaced) that lists your name, your Panther ID, the date
 Use footnote citations, including a page number (see my Footnote FAQhandout for step-by-step
instructions)
 Review for errors of spelling and grammar—this is a formal written report! I recommend using
the advanced spelling and grammar check functions in MS Word.
 Submit the paper online using the appropriate turnitin link on Blackboard Learn; turnitin is
plagiarism detection software.
 Use quote marks and correct footnote citations with page numbers to protect yourself from being
accused of plagiarism
Paper Organization
Your paper must include an introduction, several distinct body paragraphs, and a conclusion.
Your introduction should not begin with broad, overly general statements, but instead should introduce the specific time, place, and topic you are writing about. Your introduction should also include a) a thesis statement that interprets your primary sources within the historical context, and b) an overview of how the remainder of your paper will be organized (a “roadmap” for your reader).
Your body paragraphs should each be organized around a main idea, and should offer evidence to support that main idea. Be sure that your paragraphs each have a topic sentence. Check to be sure that all of the evidence you offer in the paragraph relates to and supports that topic sentence.
Your conclusion should summarize your ideas and suggest connections to course themes.
Papers will be evaluated using the following rubric:
Content – 45%
Addresses the question; offers an argument; supports the argument with evidence from the primary and secondary sources; has a clear introduction and conclusion; is clearly organized
Excellent
Persuasive argument; evidence appropriate to the argument; effectively and creatively answers the question; clearly organized; excellent introduction and conclusion
Acceptable
Any or all of the following: Some evidence of an argument, but needs clarification or elaboration; evidence may not be entirely appropriate; organization may be confusing; some evidence may have been overlooked
Poor
Any or all of the following: Does not offer an argument; does not answer the question; does not provide appropriate evidence
Readings – 15%
Makes thorough and effective use of course readings and ideas discussed in class
Excellent
Clearly describes authors and their ideas; draws on multiple assigned readings creatively; quotes and cites specific passage
Acceptable
Makes limited use of assigned readings; misses opportunities to engage with the ideas and evidence in course readings; may quote and cite from readings, but may also miss opportunities to do so
Poor
Does not quote or cite readings; does not show evidence of having completed and understood readings
Grammar/spelling – 10%

Excellent
Clear, professional writing style
Acceptable
Grammar and spelling do not detract from readability, but the writing style shows room for improvement; proofreading might be called for
Poor
Grammar, spelling, and/or type-o’s detract from readability
Length – 10%
Meets length requirements
Excellent
Approximately 1450- 1500 words

Acceptable
1,100 -1,400 words

Poor
Fewer than 1,100 words