Instructions:
Create a PowerPoint presentation to inform a group of managers about the growth of data analytics and how it could be used to benefit a business.
Estimated time to complete: 2 hours
Presentation requirements:
define data analytics (1-2 slides)
describe why data analytics is growing (1-2 slides)
provide an example from our current companies use of data analytics (2-3 slides)
explain how this benefits the company (1-2 slides)
discuss how this might be used in other businesses (2-3 slides)
Submit:
PowerPoint presentation (.ppt/.pptx)
Rubric
BU204 Unit 4 Assignment – The Role of Data Analytics
BU204 Unit 4 Assignment – The Role of Data Analytics
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis of Knowledge
20 pts
Level 5
Connects and extends knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/field/discipline to civic engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.
18 pts
Level 4
Analyzes knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/field/discipline making relevant connections to civic engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.
16 pts
Level 3
Begins to connect knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/field/discipline to civic engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.
14 pts
Level 2
Begins to identify knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/field/discipline that is relevant to civic engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.
12 pts
Level 1
There Is some evidence that knowledge is identified (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/field/discipline that is somewhat relevant to civic engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.
0 pts
Level 0
There is little to no evidence that knowledge is identified (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/field/discipline that is somewhat relevant to civic engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDefines Content
20 pts
Level 5
Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.
18 pts
Level 4
Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.
16 pts
Level 3
Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.
14 pts
Level 2
Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.
12 pts
Level 1
Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual facts but does not provide a defined statement.
0 pts
Level 0
There is no evidence of a defined statement.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRelationship to Research
20 pts
Level 5
Evaluates materials for scholarly significance and relevance within and/or across the various disciplines, evaluating them according to their contributions and consequences.
18 pts
Level 4
Examines materials for scholarly significance within and/or across the various disciplines to explore contributions in relation to important questions.
16 pts
Level 3
Uses materials in the context of scholarship to develop a foundation of disciplinary knowledge and to raise and explore important questions.
14 pts
Level 2
Engages materials with the intention and expectation of building topical and world knowledge.
12 pts
Level 1
Approaches materials in the context of assignments with the intention and expectation of finding right answers and learning facts and concepts to display for credit.
0 pts
Level 0
There is little to no evidence of engagement with outside materials used in a scholarly manner.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion and Related Outcomes
30 pts
Level 5
Conclusions (consequences and implications) are logical and reflect informed evaluation and the ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed in priority order.
27 pts
Level 4
Conclusions are logically tied to and reflect students informed evaluation in priority order and are clearly identified.
24 pts
Level 3
Conclusion is logically tied to a range of information and is identified clearly.
21 pts
Level 2
Conclusion is logically tied to information (because information is chosen to fit the desired conclusion).
18 pts
Level 1
Conclusion is inconsistently tied to some of the information discussed and oversimplified.
0 pts
Level 0
Conclusion is either not present, unclear, or does not reflect the information presented.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
5 pts
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]