Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. There should be three main sections, one for each bullet below. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with at least two (2) sources using citations in your essay. Make sure to cite using the APA writing style for the essay. The cover page and reference page in correct APA do not count towards the minimum word amount. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.
Part 1: Describe why ethical safeguards designed for clinical research may not be feasible or appropriate for evidence-based practice or evidence-based practice implementation projects.
Part 2: . Discuss three main ethical controversies related to implementing Evidence-Based Quality Improvement (EBQI) Initiatives. Describe how these controversies relate to the four core ethical principles of research.
Social and clinical value. Every research study is designed to answer a specific question.
Scientific validity. A study should be designed in a way that will get an understandable answer to the important research question.
Fair subject selection. The primary basis for recruiting participants should be the scientific goals of the study not vulnerability, privilege, or other unrelated factors.
Favorable risk-benefit ratio. Uncertainty about the degree of risks and benefits associated with a clinical research study is inherent.
Independent review. To minimize potential conflicts of interest and make sure a study is ethically acceptable before it starts, an independent review panel should review the proposal.
Part 3: Identify which ethical principles may be in conflict with the concept of patients having an ethical responsibility in improving healthcare. Discuss how these conflicts may be resolved.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]