How did this week’s assigned readings challenge or affirm your thinking? What did you agree or disagree with and explain why (provide evidence to support your points? We all read the assigned readings, so do not repeat them for us.

1. How did this week’s assigned readings challenge or affirm your thinking? What did you agree or disagree with and explain why (provide evidence to support your points? We all read the assigned readings, so do not repeat them for us. Give us a fresh take by including your analysis and perspective. Your response must be detailed and show deep, reflective, and critical thinking. I encourage you to use current events, lived experiences, and artifacts (videos, images, etc.) to support your response. 2. Using the relational leadership model element of being ethical, why would a leader need to pay attention to the ideas brought up in this week’s assigned readings? In other words, how would this week’s readings influence a leader who seeks to be ethical? You will need to reference/use the appropriate part of the relational leadership model (found in Week 2 module) and use it to frame your response. As a refresher, here is one definition of leadership from Week 2: “An influence relationship among leaders and followers who intend real changes and outcomes that reflect their shared purposes. (Daft, 2018, p. 5) 3. Write at least one (no more than two) discussion question that will engage classmates. The question you ask should not be a yes or no question, nor one with a simple answer, but one designed to provoke deep and diverse responses. 4. You must respond substantively to at least two classmates discussion questions.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]