Analyze a pressing international policy issue from the perspective of two thinkers representing two distinct theoretical schools (e.g., Mearsheimer vs. Keohane). The views of the chosen thinkers should be sufficiently different to make for an interesting debate. You can choose a policy issue of interest to them or refer to sample policy documents provided for ideas. The paper should consist of the following elements: An introduction written from your own perspective briefly describing the crux of the issue and its significance for international affairs or foreign policy (1 page).An analysis of the issue written from the first thinkers perspective. It should identify the main cause of the problem, as well as present a set of policy prescriptions (4 pages).An analysis of the issue written from the second thinkers perspective. It should identify the main cause of the problem, as well as present a set of policy prescriptions (4 pages).A conclusion written from your own perspective adjudicating between the two perspectives (1 page).Expectations for presenting your arguments: Arguments on both sides should be clear and easy to identify.Arguments on both sides should be substantiated by evidence from reputable sources with proper citations **********(Sources included in zip file).******************* Arguments on both sides should be consistent with (and demonstrate an understanding of) the assumptions and causal logics associated with the respective thinkers.The analyses should demonstrate the your ability to interpret facts (contemporary or historical) from two different perspectives, sometimes emphasizing different aspects of the issue to advance the sharpest, most compelling arguments on both sides.The policy prescriptions should logically follow from the respective thinkers diagnoses of the problem.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]