Eliot Cohen stated, “Airpower is an unusually seductive form of military strength, in part because…it appears to offer gratification without commitment.” Consider how airpower’s capabilities have potentially made it the “easy call” for political decision-makers.
In this light, consider the proper role of airpower leaders as they advise civilian leadership. In John Garofano’s article, “Deciding on Military Intervention: What is the role of senior military leaders?,” he uses (and commends) the example of GEN Matthew Ridgway, who avoided recommending particular courses of action and simply reported the real costs of serious military commitment. Do you agree with the author that Ridgway’s example is the best approach for senior airpower leaders? Why or why not?
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]