An advantage of authoritative power over coercive power is that individuals voluntarily submit to it. But why would people submit to any power that restricts their freedom of action?

please write question 1 only. im attaching the questions and the readings
Instructions:-
All questions will be crafted to solicit not only your understanding of course content, but also your ability to critically engage and evaluate that content. It will not be sufficient, in other words, to merely repeat course content in your answers. You must also present you own, unique points of view. Good answers must be creative and distinctive, demonstrating both a sophisticated knowledge of course content and the critical capacity to evaluate that content. Under no circumstances should you copy material from either class notes or the class text into your answers.
Please write about only question number 1 this is the question em wrting here too.
1. An advantage of authoritative power over coercive power is that individuals voluntarily submit to it. But why would people submit to any power that restricts their freedom of action? The answer is not easy to find; political philosophers have grappled with the question for centuries, searching for the roots of consent to authority (Selected Readings for Political Studies 100, page 15). Imagine yourself to be a political philosopher asked to address this question. What answer would you provide? Why and under what conditions are people willing to submit themselves to authority? Be sure to address the distinction between authoritative and coercive power in your answer.
Please make sure you check the class reading from page no. 11-24 and also i attached the book reading.
please contact me if doubt thanks

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]