Write a Review How to Cite Shakespeare to help you properly cite the play.

Directions: Choose ONE of the prompts below and craft a well-developed response
consisting of four (4) paragraphs (short intro, two body paragraphs, and short conclusion).
You MUST use 3-5 pieces of evidence from the play to support your claim.
Review How to Cite Shakespeare to help you properly cite the play.

Include:
A very brief introduction that moves from broad to narrow ideas and contains a precise thesis (either open or closed).
Your introduction should include the title, author, and genre.
Body paragraphs that each develop one distinct point that supports the thesis and that utilize 3-5 pieces of textual evidence and analysis to support the point.
A brief conclusion that broadens the thesis to connect to more universal or global ideas.
Use 3rd person, present tense.
Correct MLA formatting.
Avoid mere plot summary.
Essay should be about 2 pages and not exceed 3 pages.

The prompts are as follows:
Persuasive Analysis:
Consider the power of persuasive appeals and rhetoric in Julius Caesar. Analyze how
a character uses rhetoric (emotion, logic, and/or ethics) to manipulate the thoughts or actions
of another character in the play.
Options:(Choose only one to analyze)
How does Cassius effectively persuade Brutus to join the conspiracy?
How does Portia effectively persuade Brutus to confide in her?
How does Antony effectively persuade the plebeians to rise to mutiny?

Body Paragraph Organization Suggestions (Present your evidence in chronological
order.) :
Option 1: Two paragraphs analyzing the use of appeals/devices in chronological order
Option 2: Each paragraph (two total) analyzing a appeal or rhetorical device that was used (use evidence in chronological order within each paragraph)
Option 3: Each paragraph (two total) about a main point/argument made in the speech. In your analysis you will still need to use language specific to the appeals/devices, but this could allow you to talk about multiple appeals being used together.
*Your conclusion should show a bigger impact of speech – how did it impact the rest of the play?
*Reminder: Do NOT use the words ethos, pathos, and logos in your essay!

Tragic Hero Analysis:
Thinking of the idea of protagonists and tragic heroes, you must make a decision. Who is the
tragic hero in this play? Is it Caesar, who dies well before the end but whose power and name
continue on? Or is it Brutus, the noble man who falls because of his tragic flaws?
Decide which character (Caesar or Brutus) is the tragic hero, identify their tragic flaw, and
explain how it causes their downfall.
One to two pieces of evidence should be an example of their tragic flaw.
Two pieces of evidence should support HOW that flaw caused their downfall.
Body Paragraph Organization Suggestions (Present your evidence in chronological
order.) :

Option 1: 1 paragraph identifying character flaw, 1 paragraph about how flaw causes downfall.
*Make sure to show correlation between flaw and downfall.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Briefly discuss what critical approach you are planning to apply in the analysis of your selected story.

For this weeks discussion, and after you read William Faulkner’s A Rose for Emily (Links to an external site.), post an original thread in two brief paragraphs. In the first brief paragraph, freely reflect on the story overall. Also, comment whether this is your first Faulkner story and whether you liked or disliked his style and story.

In the second brief paragraph, discuss whether you are selecting Kate Chopin’s “The Story of an Hour” or William Faulkner’s A Rose for Emily (Links to an external site.) for your comment paper that is due this week. Also, briefly discuss what critical approach you are planning to apply in the analysis of your selected story.

After you post your thread, come back to comment and reflect on two classmates’ posts.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

What are the implications of Platos discussion of justice for the four disputed features of Socrates good city discussed by Eric Brown?

What are the implications of Platos discussion of justice for the four disputed features of Socrates good city discussed by Eric Brown? Include your comments on Platos allegory of the cave.

Your comments must draw on both the secondary sources as well as Platos Republic, Book VII linked in the Content. Note that no other edition of Republic is acceptable.

PLATOS CAVE ANALYSIS IS https://youtu.be/axARKd24eHo

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

What are some of the overall consequences of the problem (both negative and positive)?

For this assignment, you are required to write a 6-to7 page paper that outlines the history and
consequences of race and racism in the United States, along with the potential causes and solutions
to address racism in the U.S.
Due Date: 5/20/21 on Blackboard
Section I
In two pages, please address the following elements in your paper (Please do not turn in your
original submission with no revisions. This section should be revised and improved upon):
What is the problem?
a. Describe the history of the problem
b. What are some of the overall consequences of the problem (both negative and positive)?
c. What individuals, groups, organizations, and/or social institutions are involved?
d. What values, beliefs, and norms are associated with this problem?
Section II
In three-to-four pages, please address potential causes and solutions to the social problem under
investigation. In order to receive full credit, the following questions must be addressed:
Causes of the problem
a) What social factors are involved? At what level (state, neighborhood, school etc.)?
b) Who is making these claims (e.g. media, scholars, etc.)?
Solutions to the problem
a) What solutions have been proposed and by whom (individuals, groups, etc)?
b) What aspects of the problem are addressed? Which are not?
c) What solutions have been tried already? What solutions work? Evidence?
d) What additional problems do the solutions raise?
Section III
In one page summarize and take a position on the social problem you are investigating. More
specifically, please address the following questions:
What conclusion(s) can you draw about the problem? What are your own reactions now that you
have researched and critically analyzed the problem? What do you think would be best solution to
solve this problem? Support your position with evidence from prior research and/or other data.
References
In order to receive full credit, please provide at least 5 citations to support the evidence provided in
your paper. You are also required to use ASA format throughout the document. For more resources,
please see the following link:
https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/asa_style/references_page_formatting.html

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

How does Cassius effectively persuade Brutus to join the conspiracy?

Julius Caesar Essay

Directions: Choose ONE of the prompts below and craft a well-developed response
consisting of four (4) paragraphs (short intro, two body paragraphs, and short conclusion).
You MUST use 3-5 pieces of evidence from the play to support your claim.
Review How to Cite Shakespeare to help you properly cite the play.

Include:
A very brief introduction that moves from broad to narrow ideas and contains a precise thesis (either open or closed).
Your introduction should include the title, author, and genre.
Body paragraphs that each develop one distinct point that supports the thesis and that utilize 3-5 pieces of textual evidence and analysis to support the point.
A brief conclusion that broadens the thesis to connect to more universal or global ideas.
Use 3rd person, present tense.
Correct MLA formatting.
Avoid mere plot summary.
Essay should be about 2 pages and not exceed 3 pages.

The prompts is
Persuasive Analysis:
Consider the power of persuasive appeals and rhetoric in Julius Caesar. Analyze how
a character uses rhetoric (emotion, logic, and/or ethics) to manipulate the thoughts or actions
of another character in the play.
Options:(Choose only one to analyze)
How does Cassius effectively persuade Brutus to join the conspiracy?
How does Portia effectively persuade Brutus to confide in her?
How does Antony effectively persuade the plebeians to rise to mutiny?

Body Paragraph Organization Suggestions (Present your evidence in chronological
order.) :
Option 1: Two paragraphs analyzing the use of appeals/devices in chronological order
Option 2: Each paragraph (two total) analyzing a appeal or rhetorical device that was used (use evidence in chronological order within each paragraph)
Option 3: Each paragraph (two total) about a main point/argument made in the speech. In your analysis you will still need to use language specific to the appeals/devices, but this could allow you to talk about multiple appeals being used together.
*Your conclusion should show a bigger impact of speech – how did it impact the rest of the play?
*Reminder: Do NOT use the words ethos, pathos, and logos in your essay!

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Is the use of a structured benefit-risk assessment framework (quantitative, qualitative or quantitative/qualitative) to evaluate an investigational product’s benefits and risks during development providing greater benefits or not?

so we had to find 3 credible articles (I attached them for your review) and for below topic: and write an annotated bibliography.
. Benefit-Risk Assessment topics
Is the use of a structured benefit-risk assessment framework (quantitative, qualitative or quantitative/qualitative) to evaluate an investigational product’s benefits and risks during development providing greater benefits or not?
here were the instructions and requirement for the assignment:
Overview
This assignment requires that you prepare an annotated bibliography with three annotations of peer reviewed publications which provide literature support for your chosen topic for the Business Memo assignment. Each brief evaluative summary is called an annotation or ‘annotated bibliography’. An annotation is a term to describe a brief, evaluative summary which lays out the purpose, main themes, conclusion, credibility of author and source (if this is an article, the source is the journal that published the article), limitations and the critical analysis (does the information in the article add to the existing body of knowledge on the chosen topic).
As important, this assignment requires that you accurately assess what the author(s) is saying in the source document by analyzing and interpreting what the author(s) means without putting a spin on it. Typically, one reads an article two or more times to accurately interpret what the author(s) state.
This assignment is also intended to demonstrate that your ability to conduct research for scholarly source materials, using Himmelfarb Library and websites such as FDA.gov, to find credible works to inform your chosen topic for Assignment 2, the Business Memo.
By completing this assignment, the student demonstrates initial competence in MSHS Clinical Research Program Student Learning Outcome I. Evaluate research design principles through assessment of scientific, medical, regulatory and commercial aspects required to formulate a clinical development plan for an investigational product. This assignment also demonstrates competence in The Joint Task Force Clinical Trial Competency Framework Domain 3.0 Investigational Products Development and Regulation which encompasses knowledge of how investigational products are developed and regulated.
In addition, the student initially fulfills the Program Student Learning Outcome III. Formulate strategies to address ethical and cultural considerations to ensure compliant national and international clinical trial conduct, in relation to key areas such as Good Clinical Practices, subject recruitment/retention, data integrity and risk assessment. which aligns with the Joint Task Force Clinical Trial Competency Framework for Domain 2.0 Ethical and Participant Safety Considerations which encompasses care of patients, aspects of human subject protection, and safety in the conduct of a clinical trial.
Resources for Writing an Annotated Bibliography
Click into above Hyperlink to access the Resources for Writing an Annotated Bibliography and Assignment Submission Link.
Note also when using Himmelfarb Library, click on databases/G/Google Scholar. Google Scholar is another searching strategy which is commonly used. The benefit of using Google Scholar within Himmelfarb is that the articles/references will be available next to the citation.
Business Memo Topics and Resources
Listed below is each topic stated with two positions. For this Annotated Bibliography assignment, do not pick a position yet. First complete your Annotated Bibliography. We recommend you let your research guide you in selecting your position. Make an evidence-based selection. You may use any of these resources in your Business Memo. You may not use any of these resources for your Annotated Bibliography assignment and this is what the old writer delivered for annotated bibliography.the feedback I received was:
Thank you for transmitting the three articles used for your AB assignment. I am confirming receipt. Since your topic is focused on the structured BRA, I am thinking that the Ball et al. article may be that helpful since it focuses on safety aspects only.

These three articles are satisfactory for including in your AB assignment. I am not clear if and how the Ball et al. article is going to be supportive of your position.

A student does not have to use all the articles included in the AB assignment for the second assignment.this week’s assignment is the continuation of the annotated bibliographyase on the position we chose which was:
Is the use of a structured benefit-risk assessment framework (quantitative, qualitative or quantitative/qualitative) to evaluate an investigational product’s benefits and risks during development providing greater benefits or not?

we have to : write a Thesis Statement (your position statement) and Introduction for Business Memo. This Discussion Board focuses on your particular thesis statement and Introduction section for the Business Memo assignment. Scenario, that is, to whom and working in what type of organization are you submitting your Business Memo? It is going to be important for you to decide to whom you are writing your Business Memo to, that is, come up with your scenario. It is best to think about this early to help guide you in how you are framing your Business Memo.
Post your draft thesis statement (your position) and the Business Memo information to support your position for this assignment (Pleasepost your main concepts in bullet format as opposed to writing out the whole section in full text).Please try to use a minimum of two (2) articles to support your position, and discussions in your Introduction. Remember search databases, Use GOOGLE Scholar, ; check reference lists of chosen articles etc.
Remember that you are writing a professional business MEMO to an executive. You need to convince your organization’s CEO, COO or President, or vice president/director (whomever!) that your position is the best approach so consider this when you prepare each section of the Business Memo.
Also you can use I. You can use the first person in APA, and APA also prefers using the active voice. In the context of this assignment and the fact that it is a memo, I could absolutely work. As long as the focus is on the research/information/arguments and not placed on you/I.also check the requirements for the business memo to have a better understanding on what to write for the thesis .please note that you need new articles to support your thesis. new credible articles. The attached word document is what I wrote but I believe it is incorrect. Please help me correct this. Technically its supposed to be a thesis on why I believe the benefits are better than the risks in this case and a base for the business memo(attached instruction) for next week.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

How, in your opinion, the US government would or should regulated an overheated housing market?

1. Our memories of toilet paper and disinfectants disappearing from the shelves in March and April with a speed of light are still fresh. As off this date, disinfecting wipes are still hard to find, among other cleaning products. Now we enjoy more stable supply of the “white gold”. In about 100 words or less discuss other incidents when barter could be more effective during periods of shortages, such as pandemics.
Part 2:
Read The Economist article (attached as PDF) and answer the following questions:

1. Name at least two Chinese government regulations that in your opinion affect the housing market in China the most? Why?

2. How, in your opinion, the US government would or should regulated an overheated housing market? Would it be done the same way as in China or not?

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Why the use of a structured benefit-risk assessment framework (quantitative, qualitative or quantitative/qualitative) to evaluate an investigational product’s benefits and risks during development providing greater benefits ?

You need to write a thesis statement based on the annotated bibliography attached. I am going to attach the articles used for this annotated bibliography for your reference
the topic is why the use of a structured benefit-risk assessment framework (quantitative, qualitative or quantitative/qualitative) to evaluate an investigational product’s benefits and risks during development providing greater benefits ?
You need 3 credible articles to support why you think that the benefits are greater?
this is a Thesis Statement and Introduction for Business Memo that will going to be written based on your argument next week( I will attach the business memo instruction for your review) . draft thesis statement and the Business Memo information to support your position for this assignment (Please write your main concepts in bullet format as opposed to writing out the whole section in full text)
.Please try to use a minimum of two (2) articles to support your position, and discussions in your Introduction. Remember search databases, Use GOOGLE Scholar, and check reference lists of chosen articles etc.
Remember that you are writing a professional business MEMO to an executive. You need to convince your organization’s CEO, COO or President, or vice president/director (whomever!) that your position is the best approach so consider this when you prepare each section of the Business Memo.
Also you can use I. You can use the first person in APA, and APA also prefers using the active voice. In the context of this assignment and the fact that it is a memo, I could absolutely work. As long as the focus is on the research/information/arguments and not placed on you/I.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Define and explain the necessary steps for any archaeological project (background research, survey, excavation, analysis [dating, environmental considerations, seriation, bioarchaeology, etc], dissemination) and explain how you would carry each step out.

Prompt 2: Imagine you are a an archaeologist and have been assigned your very first project. This happens to be a prehistoric project in the Bay Area. Define and explain the necessary steps for any archaeological project (background research, survey, excavation, analysis [dating, environmental considerations, seriation, bioarchaeology, etc], dissemination) and explain how you would carry each step out. Make sure to define what a prehistoric archaeological project is, what types of artifacts/remains you might find, what paradigm you would work under (ex: processual vs postprocessual approach) and what tribal entity would you be working with in this particular region in California.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]