Safety in the cruise ship industry

Order Description

Please refers to paper details and paper topic document upload for paper requirement.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Situation Analysis

Order Description

It is a situation analysis, and this is group assessment, so the highlighted part from the file that i attached needs to be done.

Also, PESTOL analysis and SWOT analysis need to be done in a graph formation.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

The Early Republic

Assignment Prompt
In this assignment I want you to take on the persona of a Patriot. Be sure to briefly explain who you are (social status/profession) and where you live. Choose to be a member of one of the groups listed in the Discussion 3 assignment.

In the late 1760s and early 1770s (between the end of the Seven Years War and the beginning of the Revolution) you were upset with the imperial/colonial government. It is now a quarter-century down the road from your youth, you are well into your middle-aged years, with idealistic children, and a grandchild or two, of your own. You and your generation have sacrificed much to bring about the United States and its new government under the Constitution. President George Washington’s Administration is in place, Congress has been elected, and the form of the new government is taking shape. Are you satisfied with the new government under the recently ratified Constitution? Do you think your 20-something year old self (the protester from the 1760s) would be happy with the way things turned out? You have decided to write a treatise (a fancy word for an essay) upon this subject as a gift to your grandchildren. In it you will think about your main social, political, and economic grievances from the 1760s in relation to your current beliefs. Have things turned out well for you and your group? Have your grievances from the 1760s been redressed (or are no longer relevant)? Have new political, economic, or social issues replaced them for your socioeconomic group in the 1780s? Has your group met their social responsibilities to the new nation, have they compromised where needed for the greater good or selfishly looked after their own interests? What, if anything, is left to be done for your group? Most importantly, would your 1760s self believe that you held onto your ethics even as war raged around you; have you remained true to the ethical stands you took in the 1760s or have you grown more pragmatic with age and experience?

Be sure to use the Rule of Three in this assignment. You should have an intro with thesis statement, at least three paragraphs in the body (one old for each point of the thesis) and a conclusion. The best way to organize is to use political, economic, and social as your thesis points.

This essay should be a minimum of 5 paragraphs long. The first paragraph is your introduction with thesis statement. The second through fourth paragraphs (the body) will discuss social, economic, and political reforms (you should organize in this way, minimum of one paragraph on economic, one paragraph on social, and one on political). Each paragraph of the body must have its own thesis statement and there should be at least three pieces of evidence (properly cited in Turabian format) in support (the “rule of three” for analytical writing). The last paragraph is the conclusion.

You will be using modified Turabian FOOTNOTES in this assignment. You must provide the footnote, including locating information, for each of your three pieces of evidence per body paragraph (so a minimum of 9 footnotes required).

THE “RULE OF THREE”
You will need to use an analytical writing style in this class. The basic form of analytical writing utilizes the “Rule of Three.” Simply, there should be at least three key points/pieces of evidence in a piece of writing introduced by a strong clear thesis.

This is a 2-3 page essay length assignment. Your paper should begin with an Introduction which sets the prompt in the historical context, the LAST sentence of the intro paragraph is the thesis statement which lists the (minimum of) three points (X,Y,Z) that will be more fully developed in the paper. The first paragraph of the body (paragraph 2) would discuss key point X (this paragraph would have its own thesis as the first sentence, followed by three pieces of evidence/analysis in support), then a paragraph on Y, and finally one on Z. An essay ends with a conclusion paragraph – which sums up the argument you made and ties X, Y, and Z together. The conclusion is NOT the place to introduce new arguments or evidence.

Another way of thinking about it is that an essay is comprised of three paragraphs in the body of similar composition to the one paragraph you wrote in the Reaction 1 exercise.

So Rule of Three means three key points in a thesis, a body with three paragraphs (one for each of your key points), each paragraph has a thesis supported by three key pieces of evidence. Followed by a conclusion.

Important notes
All information you need to respond to the prompt is contained within the materials assigned in the 1311 course module. I want you to react to the assigned materials. DO NOT DO OUTSIDE RESEARCH or seek your answer on the internet.

I also want to know what YOU think, therefore DO NOT DIRECTLY QUOTE SECONDARY SOURCE MATERIALS. Most students use quotes as fillers, this is unacceptable in a college history course and does not reflect upon YOUR understanding of the topic at hand. The only acceptable use of a quote is a short (phrase or sentence) quotation from a primary source document (properly identified and cited) that you immediately discuss and is part of your analysis.

PRIMARY SOURCE = Something produced in the historical era under study

SECONDARY SOURCE = Something produced at a later date. A history textbook, a documentary film, etc.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Compare and contrast TWO theories of ‘gender’ and ‘gender difference’ from any of the following: Juliet Mitchell, Dorothy Dinnerstein, Nancy Chodorow or Judith Butler.

Please use Judith Butler
Please clearly display that the essay is structured and it is vital that you compare and contrast TWO theories of both ‘gender’ and ‘gender difference’
Please write a very good essay as I hope to use you time and time again in the future and will definitely be giving you a lot of business.
Thank you
Question:
Compare and contrast TWO theories of ‘gender’ and ‘gender difference’ from any of the following: Juliet Mitchell, Dorothy Dinnerstein, Nancy Chodorow or Judith Butler.
2020 words max 2000 words minimum

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

please see attachment

this essay is very important for me . it takes up 30% for grade of this course. please take care of it. I have attach the ebook and instruction to you. THE ONE SOURCE IS THE BOOK(ATTACHMENT).Do not use outside resource. please follow the instruction to finish this essay.book instruction

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Many managers are promoted to their highest level of incompetence’ – critically discuss

Order Description

submit a report consisting of a concise summary of their responses to the
end
–
of
–
case discussion questions (max
9
00 words per a group, excluding in
–
text references and
reference list) to their lectu
rer/tutor.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT LEVEL 6 AE3

Order Description

Assignment Brief

Concerned by the continuing, global, economic situation, the Board of a Trans-National Company [TNC]** has asked you to demonstrate how the effective application of Strategic Management could improve the strategic performance of such an organisation.

The Board has asked that you select an appropriate company for review and [whether or not that company is a TNC] to position both it and its key competitors on the framework in Fig.13.5**; then, to critically evaluate both your chosen company and its key competitors, before presenting your research findings – via a Portfolio of evidence, with a short, strongly-focused, Executive Summary.

The Board is known to be concerned that the term Strategic Management seems to have come to have multiple interpretations, for the TNC’s stakeholders; the Board is, also, known to have seen the:
• Bain & Company: “Management Tools & Trends 2013”
• [2013] Thinkers 50 ranking of `management gurus’
as, potentially, useful starting points for your research and for structuring any final Portfolio of evidence – but the Board does not wish to constrain your own final approach

The Board recognises that some aspects of research [e.g. GDP trends or an organisation’s profit-performance] may not vary, according to the researcher; however, it reminds you that this is an individual piece of work – hence, ensure that your Portfolio of evidence is clearly your own work and where any specific data has been researched with any others, make that clear [along with the relevant Student Number(s), on the relevant page of your Portfolio], whilst keeping the emphasis of each page on your own strategic analysis.

The Board would expect the Portfolio of evidence to contain detailed evidence and applied models that, collectively, both underpin and focus your central argument(s). The Board does, not, however, want a lot of generic material, personal views and/or description – instead, it is looking for:
• demonstrable evidence of holistic evidence/ argument(s), running through your Portfolio of evidence – per Solent Critical Thinking Method (Uploaded)
• the Critical Success Factors of your central argument(s) and a set of credible Recommendations to be clearly evident in your short, strongly-focused, Executive Summary.

The company I choose is : Ford Motor Company.

Please check all requirements

** using the definition of a TNC found at:
Johnson et al. (2011) “Exploring Strategy: Text & Cases”, 9th Ed., Harlow, FT/Prentice Hall, p.439 [available online via SSU Library Catalogue

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Film Analysis

This is a Film analysis essay which requires choosing an old movie with it’s brief description and relating it to one of the topics that I will upload as a file. There is 80 possible topics that the writer can choose from. The thesis my be clear and I have to put the essay in turnitin.com so please make sure there is citation for all the resources.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]