Your supervisor knows that you are in graduate school and currently learning about conflict resolution. You have told her that you want to move into more of a leadership role in your organization. To assist you in building your resume, she has asked you to develop a conflict resolution policy, procedures, and training for your organization.
This is a preliminary document so she wants you to keep it short. This paper should include:
Introduction to the topic of conflict
a brief discussion about what workplace conflict is and why a policy is important
policy and procedures for resolving conflict, and
a proposed outline for training topics.
Conclusion
Submit your assignment by Sunday at midnight.
This paper should:
Be approximately 4-5 pages long, double-spaced (1000-1200 words)
Include a title and reference page not included in the page count
Exclude sources older than 5 years
Include 4-5 sources from the required readings and/or scholarly sources found from Herzings library. Your textbook may be used as one source.
Include an introductory paragraph and a conclusion
Submit your assignment by Sunday at midnight.
Estimated time to complete: 4 hours
Rubric
NU530 Unit 5 Assignment Conflict Resolution Policy
NU530 Unit 5 Assignment Conflict Resolution Policy
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopic
NU530-CO1
10 pts
Level 5
Identifies a creative, focused, and manageable topic that addresses potentially significant aspects of the topic.
9 pts
Level 4
Identifies a creative, focused, and manageable topic that addresses important and notable aspects of the topic.
8 pts
Level 3
Identifies a focused and manageable/doable topic that appropriately addresses relevant aspects of the topic.
7 pts
Level 2
Identifies a topic that while manageable/doable, is too narrowly focused and leaves out relevant aspects of the topic.
6 pts
Level 1
Identifies a topic that is far too general and wide-ranging as to be manageable and doable.
0 pts
Level 0
Does not clearly identify a topic that is relative to the assignment.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExisting Knowledge, Research, and/or Views
PRICE-C; PRICE-R
20 pts
Level 5
Synthesizes in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/approaches.
18 pts
Level 4
Examines in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/approaches.
16 pts
Level 3
Explains in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/approaches.
14 pts
Level 2
Relates information from relevant sources representing limited points of view/approaches.
12 pts
Level 1
Relates information from irrelevant sources representing limited points of view/ approaches.
0 pts
Level 0
Information is irrelevant to the topic. No clear point of view/approaches.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDesign Process
NU530-CO1; PRICE-P
10 pts
Level 5
All elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are skillfully developed. Appropriate methodology or theoretical frameworks may be synthesized from across disciplines or from relevant sub-disciplines.
9 pts
Level 4
Most critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are appropriately developed. Appropriate methodology or theoretical frameworks may be analyzed from across disciplines or from relevant sub-disciplines.
8 pts
Level 3
Some critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are appropriately developed, however, more subtle elements are ignored or unaccounted for.
7 pts
Level 2
Critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are missing, incorrectly developed, or unfocused.
6 pts
Level 1
Inquiry design demonstrates a misunderstanding of the methodology or theoretical framework.
0 pts
Level 0
The design of the paper is not based upon a clear methodology or framework.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis
NU530-CO1; PRICE-I
35 pts
Level 5
Organizes and synthesizes evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
32 pts
Level 4
Organizes and analyzes evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
28 pts
Level 3
Organizes evidence to reveal important patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
25 pts
Level 2
Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing important patterns, differences, or similarities.
21 pts
Level 1
Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.
0 pts
Level 0
Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.
35 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion
NU530-CO1; PRICE-I
10 pts
Level 5
States a conclusion that is a logical extrapolation from the inquiry findings.
9 pts
Level 4
States a conclusion that is a logical interpretation of the inquiry findings.
8 pts
Level 3
States a conclusion focused solely on the inquiry findings. The conclusion arises specifically
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]