Briefly describe an organization that you are/have been involved in.
Evaluate the culture of the organization.
Evaluate the leadership style of the leader in that organization you are most familiar with.
Describe a change or addition to the current strategic plan of the organization that you think would improve its performance. For example: Increasing the culture of patient safety within the organization or the organization becoming more involved in the community it serves. Your strategic plan goal should be measurable.
Considering the culture and leadership of the organization, utilize the change process to implement the change. Make sure you include how you would evaluate the change.
The paper should:
Be approximately 6-8 pages long, double-spaced (1500-2000 words)
Include a title and reference page not included in the page count
Exclude sources older than 5 years
Include 5-6 sources from the required readings and/or scholarly sources found from Herzings library. Your textbook may be used as one source.
Include an introductory paragraph and a conclusion
Estimated time to complete: 6 hours
Rubric
NU530 Unit 6 Assignment – Organizational Analysis
NU530 Unit 6 Assignment – Organizational Analysis
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopic
NU530-CO1; NU530-CO2; NU530-CO3; NU530-CO4
15 pts
Level 5
Identifies a creative, focused, and manageable topic that addresses potentially significant aspects of the topic.
13.5 pts
Level 4
Identifies a creative, focused, and manageable topic that addresses important and notable aspects of the topic.
12 pts
Level 3
Identifies a focused and manageable/doable topic that appropriately addresses relevant aspects of the topic.
10.5 pts
Level 2
Identifies a topic that while manageable/doable, is too narrowly focused and leaves out relevant aspects of the topic.
9 pts
Level 1
Identifies a topic that is far too general and wide-ranging as to be manageable and doable.
0 pts
Level 0
Does not clearly identify a topic that is relative to the assignment.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExisting Knowledge, Research, and/or Views
PRICE-C; PRICE-R
55 pts
Level 5
Synthesizes in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/approaches.
50.12 pts
Level 4
Examines in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/approaches.
44 pts
Level 3
Explains in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/approaches.
37.88 pts
Level 2
Relates information from relevant sources representing limited points of view/approaches.
33 pts
Level 1
Relates information from irrelevant sources representing limited points of view/ approaches.
0 pts
Level 0
Information is irrelevant to the topic. No clear point of view/approaches.
55 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDesign Process
NU530-CO1; NU530-CO2; NU530-CO3; NU530-CO4
15 pts
Level 5
All elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are skillfully developed. Appropriate methodology or theoretical frameworks may be synthesized from across disciplines or from relevant sub-disciplines.
13.5 pts
Level 4
Most critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are appropriately developed. Appropriate methodology or theoretical frameworks may be analyzed from across disciplines or from relevant sub-disciplines.
12 pts
Level 3
Some critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are appropriately developed, however, more subtle elements are ignored or unaccounted for.
10.5 pts
Level 2
Critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are missing, incorrectly developed, or unfocused.
9 pts
Level 1
Inquiry design demonstrates a misunderstanding of the methodology or theoretical framework.
0 pts
Level 0
The design of the paper is not based upon a clear methodology or framework.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis
NU530-CO1; NU530-CO2; NU530-CO3; NU530-CO4
90 pts
Level 5
Organizes and synthesizes evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
81 pts
Level 4
Organizes and analyzes evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
72 pts
Level 3
Organizes evidence to reveal important patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
63 pts
Level 2
Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing important patterns, differences, or similarities.
54 pts
Level 1
Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.
0 pts
Level 0
Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.
90 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion
NU530-CO1; NU530-CO2; NU530-CO4;
15 pts
Level 5
States a conclusion that is a logical extrapolation from the inquiry findings.
13.5 pts
Level 4
States a conclusion that is a logical
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]
