you will develop a condensed literature review on a topic you chose. The literature you select should be relevant to a current issue, problem, innovation, change, or trend in your field or specialization.

LITERATURE REVIEW
Overview
For this assignment, you will develop a condensed literature review on a topic you chose. The literature you select should be relevant to a current issue, problem, innovation, change, or trend in your field or specialization.

Writing a literature review is a key part of academic work. A literature review is a piece of writing that describes what has been learned about a topic through previous research efforts. The literature review is essentially a report on work previously done in a field, to show an understanding of the context for your own writing.

Your literature review should include a minimum of five references from peer-reviewed journal articles related to your field or specialization. As a reminder, you can refer to How Do I Find Peer-Reviewed Articles? for assistance in searching for appropriate reference materials.

Literature Review Guide
A literature review is not a summary of individual sources in a list, such as in the form of an annotated bibliography. Instead, the literature review should integrate in-text citations within the paragraphs to support your analysis of the scholarly readings you selected. You will seek key themes from the different scholarly journals.

Use Academic Writer for guidance in citing sources and formatting your paper in proper APA style. See the Evidence and APA section of the Writing Center for instructions on accessing and using Academic Writer.

Critical thinking: Be sure to analyze and evaluate the articles, not just report what was written. What should you add?

Integration: Integrate information from across the sources in your review. Look for themes and commonalities. Do not just review one article after another in a linear fashion. Use headings and subheadings to organize your paper around themes you identify.

Review of the rubric: Apply critical thinking to analyze scholarly articles and point out conflicting evidence or perspectives. Apply critical thinking to evaluate scholarly articles and identify criteria used for evaluation. Synthesize information to identify missing information that limits understanding of the topic.

Critical Thinking Examples
Apply principles of critical thinking to analyze scholarly articles and point out any conflicting evidence or perspectives. For example:

“Articles X and Y (citation) promote a constructivist approach, which is in direct contrast to the behaviorist approach advocated in article Z (citation).”
Apply principles of critical thinking to evaluate scholarly articles and identify the criteria used for the evaluation. For example:

“There is a weakness in the inference made by the author (citation), as the conclusion of XXXX was not clearly supported by the data.”
“The author (citation) never clearly defined the concept of XYZ.”
Synthesize information gathered in a review of scholarly literature and identify any missing information that limits understanding of the topic. For example:

“The five articles addressed how schools are approaching XXX, but they all focused on suburban, public schools. More breadth of scope is needed to fully understand the implications of the issue.”
Instructions
Before you begin your paper, examine the scoring guide to see the grading criteria.

Use the Sample Course Paper Template [DOCX] as a guide for formatting and organizing your course papers.
Use the Week 4 Writing Revision Matrix [DOCX] template to address feedback you receive on your paper from your instructor. Refer to the Writing Revision Matrix instructions below for further information.
Paper Organization
Start with a title page and organize your paper with the following guidelines:

Title page: Use [Chosen Topic]: Literature Review as your paper title.
Introduction: The opening content should directly follow the title of the paper (repeated from the title page) and provide an introduction of your chosen topic and overview of what will be included in your paper.
Overview of topic: Begin the body of your paper with an overview of the topic you chose for this review. Your topic description can begin with a broad consideration related to education. Write in third person and include literature support.
Topic relation to specialization: Provide a detailed description and examples of how the topic you chose to review specifically relates to your specialization. Write in third person and include literature support.
Review of the literature: The literature review should include a minimum of five references from peer-reviewed journal articles related to your education specialization.
Keep in mind, as you review your articles, the process of questioning. For example, how the articles present similar or contrasting information about your topic, how well the articles support your perspective on the topic, and if you discovered something new about your topic through your literature review.
Continue to write in third person and leverage the literature.
Apply principles of critical thinking to your analyses and evaluations of the literature you review.
Conclusion: Your conclusion should emphasize the main themes in your paper and provide a synthesis of the literature reviewed.
References: Include a minimum of five different scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles (related to your field of specialization) that are also cited in the paper. Your citations must have references, and your references need to be included within your paper as in-text citations.

Additional Requirements
In addition to the requirements outlined above, your assignment should meet the following:

Assignment template: Use the Sample Course Paper Template [DOCX] for the assignment.
Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
Sources: A minimum five peer-reviewed scholarly sources.
APA formatting: Follow current APA style and formatting for in-text citations. For more information on the APA guidelines for in-text citations, go to Academic Writer and use the Learn tab to find the Quick Guides on Citing Sources and Paper Format and Organization.
Include a title page with the following title: [Chosen Topic]: Literature Review.
Be sure to include, on the references page, a minimum of five different scholarly, peer-reviewed journals (related to your field of specialization) that are also cited in the paper. Your citations must have references, and your references should be included within your paper as in-text citations.
Length: The paper should be 710 double-spaced pages in length, in addition to the title page and references page.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
Portfolio Prompt: Consider saving this assignment to your ePortfolio. The work you submit for this course will only be retrievable for a limited time, and you may want or need to access these assignments in the future.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Dennett believes that in principle, enough technological knowledge and materials can be used to assemble artificial intelligence that is exactly like human intelligence. Describe the four counter-arguments that hold that it is impossible to create a conscious robot. Elaborate on one such position.

Daniel Dennett

“Consciousness in Human and Robot Minds,” p. 588

Use evidences from the book in each answers.

Questions:

1. Dennett believes that in principle, enough technological knowledge and materials can be used to assemble artificial intelligence that is exactly like human intelligence. Describe the four counter-arguments that hold that it is impossible to create a conscious robot. Elaborate on one such position.

2. Dennett uses the humanoid in the cog project to address two apparently unique features of human consciousness – being born with innate capacities and learning from experience. Is a robot able to have these features? How?

Discussion question: For the sake of the debate about Artificial Intelligence in class, please take a side (strong AI or weak AI), and provide at least three reasons or evidence for your position. You may also instead use the term “consciousness” instead of “intelligence” as the authors do in the supplementary readings about artificial phenomenal consciousness by Manzotti and Tagliasco.

Strong AI: Robot intelligence will achieve human-like intelligence with enough time and technological advancements.

Weak AI: Robot intelligence can never achieve human-like intelligence no matter how much time and technological advancements we attain. Daniel Dennett.

“Consciousness in Human and Robot Minds,” p. 588 in the anthology.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

California Board of Psychology Law and Ethics

California Ethics, Laws and Regulations – Paper must be APA 7th Edition – Be sure to properly cite

Assignment: Search the Board of Psychology State licensing board for California and Write a summary of the key points regarding the APA Ethics Code, laws, and licensing requirements of California . The websites for paper below.

These can be found at:
California Board of Psychology Laws and Regulations (2015)
http://www.psychology.ca.gov/laws_regs/

Review the APA Ethics Code: http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx

Board Contact Information by State – Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards
http://www.asppb.net/?page=bdcontactnewpg

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Written Communication Conveys in written format moderately advanced ideas supported by personal insight and credible primary or secondary sources, with good use of conventions of Standard Written English

Final Paper Rubric

C1: Written Communication Conveys in written format moderately advanced ideas supported by personal insight and credible primary or secondary sources, with good use of conventions of Standard Written English

Introduction (See The Craft of Research, Ch 16)
Author identifies a central research problem
Author Contextualizes the problem according in relation to two different disciplines
Author responds to the problem with an interdisciplinary solution (THESIS)
Author provides a Road map for what will be discussed in the remainder of the paper (e.g. First, Ill address., then Ill address,. Finally, it will be shown that)
Body Paragraphs (See The Craft of Research, Ch 7-11, 12-15)
Argument proceeds in a logical order (What do you need to talk about, and in what order?)
Soundness of argument (Based on accurate evidence and reasoning)
ANALYSIS: Employs Claim, Reason, Evidence structure in engaging sources
Acknowledgment and response: when necessary, anticipate possible criticisms and responds to those criticisms effectively
Employs at least 10 secondary or primary sources In the analysis
The interdisciplinary character of argument is indicated by section headings or is clearly delineated in the content so that the instructor can clearly see (See the Repko book, Introduction to Interdisciplinary Studies):
Insights from Discipline A
Insights from Discipline B
Interdisciplinary integration of disciplines A and B.
Conclusion (See The Craft of Research, Ch 16)
Author emphasizes the main point of the paper (thesis)
Author address why their interdisciplinary approach adds new significance or application to the research problem (e.g. answers the So what? question by explaining why does it matters)
Identifies areas where more research can be done to shed light on this question.
Bibliography
Author provides a works-cited/bibliography page with all sources listed in appropriate citation format (MLA/APA/Chicago/etc.). For MLA, See the Basic rules section on this link: https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/mla_style/mla_formatting_and_style_guide/mla_works_cited_page_basic_format.html
Formatting

Submit plagiarism check report from plagiarismdetector.net. Use the free version, just the first 1000 words of your paper will do. Download the pdf report and submit it with your paper (NOTE: if you’re citing quotes and information from published texts, it may come back with some percent “plagiarized.” Don’t worry about that, just make sure you are correctly citing material, and you’ll be fine).
Word Document
Times new roman, 11pt font
1 Margins (should be the default in Word, go to “Layout”)
Double-Spaced
Name, Professor, Course, and Date in the top left corner of your paper
Provide a title
8-10 pages.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

How do the people in this documentary reflect some of the trends discussed in the DuMez book? Do you see any trends that contradict what DuMez writes.

academic style Chicago!

Watch Friends of God: The Evangelical Movement in America.

Book Kristin Kobes Du Mez, Jesus and John Wayne: How White Evangelicals Corrupted a Faith and Fractured a Nation, Liverlight, 2020.

How do the people in this documentary reflect some of the trends discussed in the DuMez book? Do you see any trends that contradict what DuMez writes.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

What is the issue? That is to say, identify the dilemma that makes moral choice and action difficult in this instance, as delineated by the essays (or film) that we’ve read for class

The possible dilemmata for this paper are: Trash or the justice system.

Structure of your topic should address:

What is the issue? That is to say, identify the dilemma that makes moral choice and action difficult in this instance, as delineated by the essays (or film) that we’ve read for class
What are the positions on the issue as portrayed by the essays that weve read (what is the argument/point made by each author, are they just trying to elucidate the facts of the matter, are they arguing for a policy or moral position, etc.)
What do they bring to the table as evidence?
What philosophical school (virtue ethics, natural law, consequentialist, deontological) might you analyze this dilemma with best, and/or does it mix approaches?
Where are the possible holes in your analysis?
Factual (be aware of the axioms to do with your argument: are they flawed or requiring further precision or argumentation? Is there the possibility that your citations of cases fundamentally unrealistic (red herring) or irrelevant?
Logical (are there ways in which the truth of your premises might NOT make your conclusions necessary?)
NO JUDGMENT PLEASE. That is to say, our job here is to understand as thoroughly as we can the way in which a philosopher thinks their way around an issue. Using sentences of the sort that begin with I like or I am convinced by or X makes a really good point when they say are prejudicial to the project of understand

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Self Reflection

Please follow the instruction in the file attached and I also include a sample essay for you to easier to follow. This paper refers back to the essay that you write for me before. For Part 1: Self-reflection, please use this information. I live in San Francisco, CA. I am majoring in Economics. I expect to graduate in spring 2021. Let me know if you need anything else. Thanks!

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Write a ca. 2-minute contribution (1 minute of air time corresponds roughly to a 1 page, single-spaced written text) to be aired on Radio Venceremos (radio station) during El Salvadors Civil war.

Write a ca. 2-minute contribution (1 minute of air time corresponds roughly to a 1 page, single-spaced written text) to be aired on Radio Venceremos (radio station) during El Salvadors Civil war. Your text can focus on a political, cultural, humanitarian, etc. message, it is entirely up to you. The only requirement is that it is historically grounded and meaningful to hear for a civilian population that is under almost daily military attack.

Pretend you are the radio host and living through the 12 year El Salvadors civil war and you’re reporting an issue. I’d preferably want you to focus on a humanitarian issue

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

is involuntary euthanasia murder or mercy?

Formal writing

3 body paragraphs with an intro and conclusion

each paragraph with a counter-argument

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

1. What makes Beowulf a hero?

Please just do what the title says and use 3 or 2 sources for this essay please. Also you can find this sources at google scholars.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]