My project is about Natural Systems and there are a specific questions that I should answer them in paragraphs. Each question should have a paragraph. And Reliable sources. And I will upload the questions and a description about Natural system it may help. And there should be a list of references. And it is ok 2 use any number of sources.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]I want to make reference to EPIC which is my electronic system
In your current practice area, identify the methodology(ies) you have observed in the systems development life cycle: waterfall, rapid prototyping/rapid application development, object-oriented system development, and/or dynamic system development method. Choose one of the systems and apply it to the current system that you are using. Answer the following:
1) Have any of above models been used in your practice area? 2) Have they been effective for planning and implementing new systems? Why or why not?
3) What barriers have prevented successful implementation?
4) Identify a clinical informatics problem in your practice area in need of change.
5) What recommendations would you make?
6) How would you go about implementing this change?
2-3 pages, APA format, not including title page. Read information below to see which system applies to you.
When you think about how systems are implemented they use various methods to set up their systems. The first method the waterfall follows the model shown below.
“Waterfall model” by Peter Kemp / Paul Smith – Adapted from Paul Smith’s work at wikipedia. Licensed under CC BY 3.0 via Wikimedia Commons – http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Waterfall_model.svg#/media/File:Waterfall_model.svg
According to Royce a famous computer scientist, original waterfall model, had the following phases in this order:
1.Requirements specification resulting in the product requirements document
2.Design resulting in the software architecture
3.Construction (implementation or coding) resulting in the actual software
4.Integration
5.Testing and debugging
6.Installation
7.Maintenance
As you think about this model talk about how the systems you currently use might apply to this model understanding that as one moves thru each phase they can only proceed when its preceding phase is reviewed and verified
The RAD (rapid application development) is a model based on the concept that higher-quality products can be developed faster through more expedient processes, such as early prototyping, reusing software components and less formality in team communications. This model works at a higher level has more urgent needs. Does this model apply to your current system.
• This model uses a combination of systems development life cycle and object-oriented modeling and programming.
• Object-oriented modeling
makes an effort to represent real world objects
modeling the real world entities or things (e.g., hospital, patient, account, nurse) into abstract computer software objects.
• All of the interactions or exchanges take place between or among the objects.
• Is this system similar to the one you are currently using?
• High level of user input and involvement.
• Repetitive examination that enhances detail and improves accuracy.
• Three phases:
1. preproject
2. project life cycle (feasibility and business studies, functional model iteration, design and build iteration, and implementation)
3. postproject.
Does this system coincide with the current system that you are using?
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]I want face recognition using neural network. It will be training images and test images using neural network. The images will train in the database, when I give the other image, it will recognize the images like we recognize the image or not. I am using MATLAB 2011 a on windows 8. The program will have GUI , first we will train the database based on neural network then, we will test our system.
There is a paper about this topic as well : “P.Latha plathamuthuraj@gmail.com
Selection .grade Lecturer,
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering,
Government College of Engineering, ”
Tirunelveli- 627007
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]Online assessment 1
Due date: Sunday 5th April 2015 by 1159PM
This is the quiz link
http://moodle.une.edu.au/mod/quiz/view.php?id=713588
This is a short quiz that should not take you long to complete. The quiz will open on Monday 30th March 2015 at 9AM. However, you should do the quiz as soon as you can and not leave it until the last minute to ensure you are in a position to do your best.
There are 20 questions and the format consists of a combination of multiple choice and Yes/No questions based on online learning for Week 1-3 and 5-6. Note: the Communication micro skills module in Week 4 will not be examined in this quiz.
How is this assessment connected to the learning outcomes?
This assessment relates to learning outcomes 1 and 2:
demonstrate effective interpersonal and communication skills with clients, families and significant others;
demonstrate effective interpersonal communication skills with other professionals and professional organisations;
Please have a look for the module if need any further information for this unit to be fully prepared.
http://moodle.une.edu.au/mod/quiz/view.php?id=713588
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]This paper will be submitted to a technical engineering journal.Therefore, please pay close attention to all the requirements as all of them are needed to be satisfied.
– Prompt is attached to this order. Please make sure to satisfy all the requirements mentioned in the prompt
– Sample Paper: https://illumin.usc.edu/274/automotive-active-safety-systems/1/
– In order to learn about the subject, use the this link {http://www.contourcrafting.org/} as your main source.
– THE WRITER IS TO RESEARCH AND LEARN ALL ASPECTS OF THIS TECHNOLOGY FULLY USING THE LINK MENTIONED ABOVE. ( THIS INCLUDES 1: WATCHING THE TED TALK ON THIS WEBSITE 2: LEARNING AND STUDYING ALL THE APPLICATIONS OF THIS TECHNOLOGY ON THE APPLICATION TAB. 3: READING ALL THE UPLOADED PAPERS UNDER THE RESOURCES TAB. 4: AND FINALLY USE ALL OF THEM AND ALSO OUTSIDE RESOURCES WHILE WRITING. FAILURE IN ANY OF THESE STEP SHOULD ALLOW ME TO COLLECT MY MONEY) ( again, prompt is attached separately. these are notes on the subject)
– QUALITY NOTES:
11: Major Goal for this Journal: is to spare awareness
22: Good Hook for the intro
33: Catchy title
44: Use of analogy
55: NO adverbs should be used
66: This scientific paper should have a friendly and jovial language
77: Avoid Jargon (specific terminology) as much as it is possible and for the times when the terminology is being used, the writer has to define the term fully. Contour Crafting is a term itself 🙂
88: try to be specific as much as it is possible.
99: A brief history might be logical thing to do after the intro paragraph
111: Good Conclusion ( what’s the future of the subject/ what is it look like down the road)
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]Thesis Proposal:
Expressive power of programming languages: a comparative study
Compare different modern programming languages to discover genuine expressivity differences between them.
Programming languages can “in principle” perform any calculation that any well known universal Turing machine can perform, but are all programming languages “equivalent” in terms of what they can compute?
Goal: to examine a range of modern real-world programming languages in order to discover how much such languages differ from one another in their fundamental expressive powers (for higher-order datatypes).
Proposal content:
1- Abstract
2- Introduction
3- Background:
———–
Starting with Church-Turing computability theory.
3_1- Mathematical logic
Klenee 1959
Others..
general theory of computation notions
3_2- Programming languages
Programming languages
Expressive powers of programming languages: Matthias Felleisen (1990)
Scott 1975, and others… Noticed that parallel-or is not defined in PCF
Programming Computable Functions PCF
Link 1&2 together: how “computability” in the language considered relate (or not) to the current theoretically understood concepts of computability.
Note: the thesis will focus on 2.
—————————–
4-Approach:
4_1-Problem definition.
4_2-Methodology:
—————–
Features of modern programming languages, features contribute to essential differences in expressive powers between the languages.
4_2_1 Starting from languages specifications, if we can find some specification S (not just a syntax structure) for a program P such that: ∃ P_1 in langaue L_1 satisfies S
∄ P_2 in langaue L_2 satisfies S
4_2_2 – Computation model
Languages C and D to be considered equivalent for some programming task S by ‘simulating’ one language in another.
i.e there should be simulations g : C−>D and d : D−>C for this task S.
g,d should be ‘mutually inverse’
4_2_3- Suite of small programs in various languages that illustrate differences.
Some suggested programming languages: (based on popularity) Java, C, C++, Paython, JavaScript…
Some suggested programming tasks to be covered in the project: parallel or, Coroutines, Trampolining, Exceptions, Backtracking
-Talk about theses languages and tasks suggestion, why them?
——————————
5-Evaluation
Suggested evaluation criteria: to find 3-4 widely used programming languages and selection of task to show that none of 2 are equivalent. It can be Semi-formal evaluation.
———————
6-Output
7-Work plan: tasks and deliverable
8-References
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]What are your feelings about social psychology theories? Are your previous thoughts still revant? Why or why not? What do you notice about your thinking as the course progresses? Select theories to discuss and analyze how your thinking has changed or remained the same.
Also: Please answer all questions instructor raises as for theories you can select: Social cultural theory and social learning theory
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]please use information from chapter 2 to wrote chapter 3.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]It requires you to develop an information system
model for a system of your own choice. The aim is to get you to apply many of the system analysis and
modelling techniques discussed and illustrated in lectures and tutorials to a real, or at least realistic, case of
non-trivial but still reasonable and do-able complexity.
Choosing your system
As stated in the Introduction, the choice of which system to analyse and model is up to you. However, here
are some rough guidelines to assist you in your choice:
1 Try to choose a system for an area or application about which you know a considerable amount or
about which you are in a position to find out what you need to know. Examples might be a system
related to your current work (if you are presently employed) or previous work experience, a hobby or
interest that you have, or perhaps a system that you or a colleague or friend needs. My experience
in running earlier versions of this course shows unambiguously that this assignment will work best
(and you will learn the most from it) if you choose to analyse and develop a model for a system that
relates to the “real” world in some way, rather than one that is completely fictional and invented
entirely “within your own head”.
2 Try to choose a system of a reasonable size and level of complexity. This will probably be hard to
judge initially, but it is generally better to choose a system that is more likely to turn out to be too big
or complex rather than one that may turn out to be too small or simple. The reason for this is that, if
your choice does turn out to be too big or complex, you can always reduce the scope of your
intended system or choose to model only part of it. On the other hand, if your choice turns out to be
too simple and small to form a useful assignment exercise, it is generally harder to expand it to make
it more suitable as a worthwhile learning experience as well as the basis for an acceptable
assignment submission. Although we won’t discuss these metrics until mid-way through the course
(so they will be less useful to you at the beginning), one useful indicator of size and complexity of a
project is the number of entities in its data model. If this turns out to be somewhere around 6-8 for
your project then you probably have a suitably sized system for this assignment, although these
numbers should definitely not be treated as hard limits. However, if the number of entities in your
data model is significantly fewer than 6 then the model is probably too small and simple to be a
useful learning exercise; and if it is many more than 8 then it is probably starting to get too large to
feasibly tackle. Another indicator is the number of levels you find yourself going down to in your DFD
hierarchy. If this is more than two for the first few processes you decompose, and there are more
than about seven processes on your level 0 diagram, then your chosen system is highly likely to be
too big and you may have to reduce its scope or simply leave parts of the model incomplete.
Your tasks and deliverables
Your second assignment deliverable is a mid-project progress report. This is to be provided digitally via
Wattle and carries a weighting of 10% of the total project mark. In fact, calling this deliverable a “progress
report” is somewhat misleading since it is not to be a formal report describing what progress you have made
to date but is rather to show what progress you have made by providing all of the (no doubt unfinished,
incomplete, draft and still developing) analysis work that you have done on the project so far. And again, like
the first deliverable, what you provide here will form the basis on which you will build the relevant sections of
your final assignment deliverable (see below).
The third and final deliverable for this assignment, worth the remaining 85% of the total project mark, is a
report (submitted digitally via Wattle) containing the following:
1. An Introduction that describes the overall background and rationale for the system you have chosen
to model. In writing this Introduction you should assume that your reader has little or no knowledge
of the application area and system with which you are dealing and this Introduction should therefore
take your reader to a point where she/he has enough information to fully understand all the material
that follows. This will, of course, be based on what you provided for the first project deliverable (see
above).
2. A section describing the scope, functions, constraints, and any other relevant features that apply to
the system you have chosen to model. Be careful, in writing this as well as the following section, to
avoid focussing on matters that are primarily technical. Remember that it is analysis you are
supposed to be doing, not design or implementation, and this is largely a business-oriented activity
dealing with what the system should be doing rather than how it is eventually going to do it.
3. A section presenting the detailed user requirements that form the basis for your model of the system.
While it is not always possible, generally the best projects are those that have real potential users
(other than you!) for the system you are analysing and modelling and with whom you need to interact
to develop the list of detailed system user requirements.
4. A section documenting the actual models you have constructed. This is to include process, logic and
data models. The process model is to be constructed using the DFD technique and should, at least
for several processes, extend all the way down to a primitive DFD together with its associated logic
model. The data model is to be constructed using the ER diagramming technique. You are also to
provide a data dictionary in which the meanings of all the important terms in your model are
explained.
5. A section in which you provide either a UML version of your system model or a “Soft” analysis of the
context in which your system development would take place, whichever is more appropriate for the
system with which you are dealing in your project.
NOTE: If you believe it is appropriate, you may include both a “Soft” analysis and a UML version of
your system model. If you do opt to include both, you will be eligible for bonus marks up to 10% of
the value of the whole assignment. That is, if you provide both a UML version of your model and a
“Soft” analysis for your project then your maximum possible mark for the project as a whole will be
66 rather than 60. A word of warning is appropriate here, however: I will be more impressed by a
project that does a good and thorough job of the required work as opposed to one that attempts
everything, and as a result does a poorer quality job on all of it. A good quality basic assignment
without the inclusion of the optional extra material will most likely earn more marks than a poorer
quality one that attempts everything.
6. Lastly, a section in which you reflect on your analysis work and discuss what you learned about the
analysis process as well as any difficulties you faced and how you overcame them, and any other
interesting points that emerged from your assignment work. Please also include, in this section, your
thoughts on the value of the assignment as a learning tool for this course, and any way(s) in which
you think it could be improved.
Other Remarks
If you have difficulty in deciding what would be an appropriate system to model, or are having other trouble
deciding what to do, please discuss it with me before you set out too far in your work.
You may use an appropriate CASE tool to assist you in your work, in fact, it is STRONGLY recommended if
you can obtain or have access to one, but it is not essential for the purposes of this assignment. As the work
needs to be submitted digitally via Wattle uploaded, any hand-drawn materials will need to be scanned and
included in your assignment upload file (Word document or PDF).
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]