Unit 4 Case Studies
Instructions
Identify a friend, peer, or family member you can interview to collect comprehensive subjective and objective data, as though they were a new patient in your office.
Conduct an interview.
Document the subjective and objective findings in a word document and submit to Canvas. This will be evaluated by the clinical faculty.
Rubric
NU610 Unit 4 Assignment – Case Studies Rubric
NU610 Unit 4 Assignment – Case Studies Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSubjective Data
20 pts
Highly Proficient
Elements of subjective data (CC, HPI, PMH, Allergy identification, Medication Reconciliation, Social History, Family History, Health Promotion, and ROS) are adeptly documented and demonstrate consistent information across all aspects represented
16 pts
Proficient
Elements of subjective data (CC, HPI, PMH, Allergy identification, Medication Reconciliation, Social History, Family History, Health Promotion, and ROS) are appropriately documented and demonstrate consistent information across all aspects represented
12 pts
Marginally Proficient
Elements of subjective data (CC, HPI, PMH, Allergy identification, Medication Reconciliation, Social History, Family History, Health Promotion, and ROS) are satisfactorily documented but do not demonstrate consistent information across all aspects represented
8 pts
Approaching Proficiency
Elements of subjective data (CC, HPI, PMH, Allergy identification, Medication Reconciliation, Social History, Family History, Health Promotion, and ROS) are either not satisfactorily documented or do not demonstrate consistent information across all aspects represented
4 pts
Not Proficient
Elements of subjective data (CC, HPI, PMH, Allergy identification, Medication Reconciliation, Social History, Family History, Health Promotion, and ROS) are not satisfactorily documented and do not demonstrate consistent information across all aspects represented
0 pts
Not Evident
There are elements of subjective data (CC, HPI, PMH, Allergy identification, Medication Reconciliation, Social History, Family History, Health Promotion, and ROS) that are not provided in assignment.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeObjective Data
20 pts
Highly Proficient
Elements of objective data are adeptly documented and demonstrate consistency relative to the information documented in the CC, HPI, PMH, and ROS
16 pts
Proficient
Elements of objective data are appropriately documented and demonstrate consistency relative to the information documented in the CC, HPI, PMH, and ROS
12 pts
Marginally Proficient
Elements of objective data are satisfactorily documented but do not demonstrate consistency relative to the information documented in the CC, HPI, PMH, and ROS
8 pts
Approaching Proficiency
Elements of objective data are either not satisfactorily documented or do not demonstrate consistency relative to the information documented in the CC, HPI, PMH, and ROS
4 pts
Not Proficient
Elements of objective data are not satisfactorily documented and do not demonstrate consistency relative to the information documented in the CC, HPI, PMH, and ROS
0 pts
Not Evident
There are elements of objective data that are not provided in the assignment.
20 pts
Total Points: 40
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]
