TAX RESEARCH MEMO

There is two parts to the questions and there needs to be two issues/conclusion/analysis per part.

 

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Tensions and Conflicts Between Native Americans and Settlers

Explain several of the tensions and conflicts that arose among the earliest settlers in the colonies and each other or the Native Americans. Show how those tensions and conflicts emerged in early American literary works.
The essay must be in proper MLA formatting. Word count requires 1,000 – 1,100 words. Please do not exceed the maximum word count or go under. Academic writing requires discipline and the ability to edit one’s thoughts and ideas. Maintaining the word count will help with this skill.
There should be a minimum of 5 sources. The sources should ONLY be taken from the documents I uploaded to this order and the Proquest/Ebsco Suite databases. Again, the writer MUST cite BOTH from the uploaded documents and the aforementioned database(s).

 

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Critical analysis of a Journal Paper

Write a critical review of a published journal article that explores aspects of Information Systems Development (ISD) methodologies or approaches.
The journal is Carmel, E. , Espinosa, J. A. & Dubinsky, Y. (2010). “Follow the Sun” Workflow in Global Software Development. (2010). Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(1), 17-37. )

The Review
The review is to be written as an academic paper that reflects your understanding of ISD practices. It is up to you what aspects, issues or arguments you put forward but they must be relevant to the IS discipline and ISD practices and must grounded in current literature. As an academic paper, all claims and assertions must be adequately substantiated with appropriate evidence. You are expected to use other literature and references, preferably from current journal or conference papers, to substantiate your argument in the review. All references must be appropriately cited and referenced. Your paper must be relevant academically and, where appropriate, indicate implications for practice. The style and form of the essay should be consistent with review articles published in IS journals.
The Review
The review is to be written as an academic paper that reflects your understanding of ISD practices. It is up to you what aspects, issues or arguments you put forward but they must be relevant to the IS discipline and ISD practices and must grounded in current literature. As an academic paper, all claims and assertions must be adequately substantiated with appropriate evidence. You are expected to use other literature and references, preferably from current journal or conference papers, to substantiate your argument in the review. All references must be appropriately cited and referenced. Your paper must be relevant academically and, where appropriate, indicate implications for practice. The style and form of the essay should be consistent with review articles published in IS journals.
The most important aspect of your paper is that it must reflect your own thinking and understanding of ISD. Please be aware of the plagiarism and collusion policies established by FIT and Monash University.
Your review essay must contain at least:
• An assignment cover sheet
• An introduction indicating the objective, focus and direction of the essay
• The body of the essay that develops the argument
• The conclusions that flow from your argument
• Full citations in the text of your essay to all references you have used to guide your analysis,
• A bibliography listing all cited material and
• The reviewed article
A detailed assessment guide will be available on the Unit website.
The assessment criteria will be based on
• Originality of argument
• Clarity of the argument and its development
• Ability to synthesise and reflect on relevant issues in ISD
• Depth and breadth of reflections
• Use of current literature
• Use of literature other than the list of recommended readings
• Relevance of references
• Layout, structure, spelling, etc. and adherence to style guides
• Adherence to citation and reference standards
• Ability to use class discussion to critically reflect on connections and conclusions between
your review and other students’ reviews of articles.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Ulcerative Collitis

An essay on Ulcerative Collitis. Please include a thorough description of the disease; current statistics of those affected; explanation on how it affects the various body systems and any medications/treatments that are available.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

rhetorical analysis of a story

The assignment is to do a rhetorical analysis of a story. The essays tend to be smaller literary works and generally argue a point of view, with the author seeking to persuade the reader.
Analysis this story “Everyday Use” by Alice Walker. I’ve uploaded a format for this essay and requirements. Please write as the “format” I uploaded. Thank You!~ 🙂

 

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Racial profiling in the war

The Research Paper, eight to ten double –spaced pages in length (exclusive of title and references pages), should demonstrate understanding of the reading assignments, class discussions, your own research, as well as the implications of new knowledge.
The student must analyze the ethical implications and homeland security implications on the following topics:
• Racial profiling in the war on terrorism.
At minimum, the paper should accomplish the following:
• Give a concise introduction to the topic and state the thesis of the paper.
• Give a thorough analysis of the ethical implications on the chosen topic.
• Give a thorough analysis of the homeland security implications on the chosen topic.
• Give a final analysis of the topic, drawing on the stated ethical and homeland security implications, justifying/not justifying its use through the Just
• War Theory (this should be as objective as possible—it is not an opinion piece).
• Give a final conclusion drawing together all research and analysis.
• Use at least 3 assigned sources and 5 additional sources found through outside research.
• Demonstrate the ability to think and analyze critically while writing a college-level research paper using APA Style format.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Comparative studies

Research journals
Systematic reviews

Table 3: Findings
Databases searched Number of hits Studies relevant to the question Study designse.g. CINAHL 102 1 RCT
1 Cohort study
Identify which paper you have selected, why, and in which databases did it appear.

Critical appraisal and plan of implementation of findings: Part B

In Part B you will critically review the research paper you have identified, from your database searches, as the “best” to answer your question. You must use an appropriate checklist to help you – one designed for EBP. References for these will be provided. If, in your search, you have found a systematic review, which directly answers your question you may not use this for the critical analysis. You will need to choose another of the papers you found and critically appraise that instead.

Critical appraisal (about 700 words)
Your critique should be written in essay format and should address three main principles of critical appraisal:
What is the research design and was this appropriate?
What are the potential sources of bias?
What are the results and are these applicable for health promotion.
These three principles overarch critical appraisal for both qualitative and quantitative evidence. However, different study designs have different methodological characteristics therefore different critical appraisal checklists are available to help you go through the process.
You must choose an appropriate checklist for the study design of your selected paper and please reference this.
How could this findings be useful in promoting health.

Conclusion
Briefly reflect on the EBP process followed to develop your research review (about 100 words).
Reference List
Please use the Harvard system (author-date approach) for referencing

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

research review

Structure:
The assessment falls into two main parts:
1. The clinical question and search strategy
2. Critical appraisal and plan of implementation of findings
The clinical question and search strategy: Part A
Part A
should explain the methodology of your review that includes your PICO, facet analysis, search plan and databases used to identify a relevant paper to answer your question.

PLEASE NOTE
For this exercise, I have chosen this question , so please work with this question:
ARE BABIES WHO ARE EXCLUSIVELY BREASTFED IN THE FIRST SIX MONTHS AS OPPOSED TO FORMULA FED, LESS PRONE TO OBESITY? You can rephrase

Method (about 700 words):
You must then demonstrate how your question has been developed through this information.

It is important that the question is properly structured. The population, intervention, counter-intervention and outcome should be used in order to give clarity to the question, with reference to the appropriate literature. The PICO framework should be discussed with the use of keyword examples for your question.

You are encouraged to include a similar table to the one provided here to demonstrate the use of PICO framework.

Table 1: PICO Analysis
Population Intervention Counter-intervention Outcome
Babies breastfeeding formula feed obesity

With P- babies
I – breastfeeding
C- formula feed
O- obesity
Finally give the precise question after your PICO table. (See question above)

Note: Please always number and name your tables or figures provided in the text.
Discuss your facet analysis. This should include the importance of developing a facet analysis and the process you followed to develop your own facet analysis (include one or two examples of keywords that you used).

Facet analysis- key words suggestions:
P- babies- infant, pediatric
I- breastfeeding- lactation
C- formula feed- bottle feed
O- obesity- overweight etc

Briefly state which databases you have used and why. As a minimum you should use three databases.EMBASE, MEDLINE-MATERNAL AND INFANT and CINAHL.
Please include aA copy of the search history from the databases you identified your research paper.
Demonstrate how the facet analysis was translated into a search strategy for these databases (i.e. index and free text terms you used, truncations and wildcards – don’t forget to define these terms, with reference to appropriate literature).
The use of Boolean operators should be demonstrated and discussed. Specify the limitations to the coverage of the search (e.g. language, study design etc.) if you have used any.

Remember to support your discussion of your search plan with reference to the literature and demonstrate the use of different tools through giving examples from your search strategy.

You are encouraged to use a similar table to the one below to present your facet analysis and search plan:
Table 2: Facet analysis and search plan
Population Intervention Counter-intervention Outcome Facet Analysis

The facet analysis table should be included in the body of your work and not appended. Please note that you do not need to include a table for each database search. Only use one table demonstrating your search plan.

At the end of the section include a table indicating the overall results from your three databases searches. E.g. how many papers you identified in each database? How many where relevant to answer the question? What type of studies did relevant papers employed?

Relevant article types to conside:
Randomised control trials
Cohort studies
Research papers

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Nutrition/Dietary

1-Use Times New Roman 12 point font
2-All spacing should be single, do not include extra spaces between paragraphs
3- I already done the first part of the paper (introduction and methods) , I need you to write the •
A) Major results and outcomes- INTERPRET THE RESULTS as you present them. What do they mean? Do they support the hypothesis of the study?
B) Strengths and weaknesses of the study. Is this an innovative design? Are there alternative hypotheses to explain the findings? Can improvements be made to the methodology?
C) A comparison of the data to other papers in the field. The purpose of the comparison section is to help us understand how the data in your paper contributes to the field of study. A minimum of 5 studies from peer-reviewed journals. This should not be copied from the discussion of the journal article.

the major outcomes and the strengths and weakness are from the original paper only , the comparison paragraph is (comparing the original article to the other 5 articles) I will be downloading the articles and the description of the paper needed and how its going to be graded so follow them so you know what does the professor is going to look for in the paper

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Chinese Theatre

Basically you need to comment 4 films with each additional two readings. At the end of commenting each film with the two additional readings that come with it, there is supposed to be a conclusion about one point that you want to make.

Start with commenting each film. You want to examine the following questions: how did watching the film make you feel? What sensations did the film evoke for you? What about the film made you feel that way? Address a specific scene, even a seemingly unimportant one, especially if it produced an unanticipated reaction. Speculate as to what the director might be trying to convey if it was indeed his or her intention to elicit this emotion from audiences. Then continues with commenting on each reading, address specific passages or quotes (include page numbers if possible), especially ones that relate to your reaction to the film. Express your opinions: do you agree with the author? Does the author’s analysis or concept work for this particular film? Why or why not? If you have trouble getting started, you are welcome to directly address one of the discussion questions provided by the instructor for each discussion section. You are also highly encouraged to read your classmates’ posts and respond to points they bring up.
While posts should cite specific passages and scenes, they should not be a simple summary of plot or events in the narrative. If you begin your post by writing: “This film was about…” and then proceed to recount what happens in the narrative, you are on the wrong track. While you should demonstrate that you watched the film and did the readings, you should do this by specifically articulating your reaction to the narrative (only summarizing relevant details).

All in all, the paper should include reaction, speculation, specific scene, summary of detail relevant to reaction, connection to at least one reading, and perhaps responds to a point raised in another post or compares film to previous ones

So, here’s the format. The first film is going to be Hero (directed by Zhang Yimou in 2002) and the readings for it is “Hero and the Globalisation of Propaganda” and “Hero”. You also address these:
– Describe the action and martial arts choreography, compare it to the movie “Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon”
– Describe the contrast between the battle choreography of the youxia (wandering knights) assassins (Nameless, Broken Arrow, Flying Snow, Sky) and the Qin military.
– How are elements such as water (rain), leaves, sand, ink, cloth, scrolls (books), and calligraphy used in martial arts fighting and what do you think they symbolize?
– Why is “fighting in the mind” an important trope in this film?
– Describe the use of color and color saturation in the film. What do the dominant colors (black, red, blue, white, and green) represent and how are they used?
– What is the function of storytelling, persuasion, and dissuasion in the film? What tropes and elements are used to detect fact from fiction?
– Discuss the concept of tianxia (“all under heaven”) in the film in terms of the following themes:
? Violence and peace
? Multiplicity and uniformity
? Freedom and security
? Cultural expression and idealism
– On the reading “Hero and the Globalisation of Propaganda,” you have to address these two questions:
1) What does Harrison mean when he calls Hero a “new kind of globalised propaganda” (572)?
? What aspects of the film denote a globalized style?
? Why does Harrison see the film as an apology for Chinese state dictatorship?
2) As works of global cinema, what, according to Harrison, are the main differences between Hero and Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon?
– On the other reading by Wendy Larson “Hero”, you should address these three questions:
1) What are “fascist aesthetics” and why have some critics claimed that Zhang Yimou’s Hero is an overt demonstration of them?
2) What is “culturalism” and why does Larson interpret Hero as a failure of culturalism to wield power and help nations gain recognition on the global stage?
3) According to Larson, how does Hero narrate the clash between the generic totems of “Chinese culture” (embodied by the xia assassins) and the supreme authority of the military state (embodied by the Qin emperor)?
? Why does “embellished storytelling” in the film “contain the seed of its own destruction” (188)?
? According to Larson, why do the two assassins voluntarily relinquish their mission and what does this act symbolize?

After done with commenting the movie Hero, continue with comment the movie Eat Drink Man Woman (Directed by Ang Lee in 1994). The readings for this movie is titled “Domestic Tragicomedy” and “Exoticism Repositioned”. For the movie, you should also address these questions:
1) How are the banquets, particularly the ritual Sunday dinners at the Chu household, choreographed in this film?
? Describe the montages of cooking and food preparation, including the images of food. What feelings are these shots designed to elicit among viewers?
? How do cooking, food, appetite, and taste work as motifs in the film?
2) What are some of the generic features of family melodrama in the film?
? Describe the relationship dynamics of the different families in the film, focusing on the Chu family but also paying attention to the Liang family and others portrayed in the film. What are the individual roles that each family member plays, and how do they transition in the film?
? How are traditional gender roles in the family reinforced or undermined in the film?
? What is the central family crisis in the film? What is at stake? Is the crisis resolved? How so?
3) Discuss the effects of the cinematography of Taipei in the film. How are Taipei’s landmarks, streets, and architecture presented?
4) Even though this story takes place entirely in Taipei, where the three Chu daughters grew up and still live, how might this be an “immigrant” narrative? What are some examples of immigrant dislocation and nostalgia in the film?

On the reading “Domestic Tragicomedy”, you should also these questions:
1) According to Ma, what is “domestic tragicomedy” and how is each film in Ang Lee’s “Father Knows Best Trilogy” an example of this genre?
? What is the dual meaning of “domestic” here?
? How does each film resolve a family crisis/conflict/tragedy through a “comic denouement” (195)?
? How does each of the films revolve around the father figure, and what does the father figure stand for?
2) Why does Ma refer to Eat Drink Man Woman as “gastronomic tourism” and “food pornography” (198)?

For the “Exoticism Repositioned,” you should also address these questions:
1) Even though Ang Lee’s Eat Drink Man Woman is set in Taiwan and Wayne Wang’s Joy Luck Club in the United States, what are the main similarities between the two films that Ty identifies?
? In what ways do both films valorize exoticism?
? How do both films offer viewers a mode of safe tourism?
? How do both films approach (or reaffirm) dichotomies of East and West, or New World and Old World, and what is their critical commentary on these cultural or generational differences?
2) What does Ty mean by “autoethnography,” and why does she see Eat Drink Man Woman as an example of this mode of filmmaking?

Once you are done with Eat Drink Man Woman, comment on the film Together (Directed by Chen Kaige in 2002). The readings for this movie is “Together” and “Chen Kaige”.

Lastly, comment on 12 Storeys (Directed by Eric Khoo in 1997). The readings for the movie is “Global Modernity, Postmodern Singapore, and the Cinema of Eric Khoo” and “Singapore Cinema”

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]